Samenvatting
The aim of this paper is to investigate which portfolio extension option: either a cheaper subbrand or a private label endorsed by the national brand is better from the consumer perspective. Two hypothetical product concepts from a leading beer brand were tested among Dutch consumers. The findings show that consumers are equally likely to try the options and form a positive or negative opinion about the manufacturer after the extension. However, when looking at the ability for a brand to cover a price conscious segment and therefore
increase penetration, the cheaper national sub-brand performs better. Given that the manufacturer will be not restricted in distribution of such a brand, our findings are in favour of a cheaper sub-brand rather than an endorsed private label.
increase penetration, the cheaper national sub-brand performs better. Given that the manufacturer will be not restricted in distribution of such a brand, our findings are in favour of a cheaper sub-brand rather than an endorsed private label.
| Originele taal-2 | English |
|---|---|
| Titel | Anzmac Proceedings |
| Aantal pagina's | 7 |
| Status | Published - 2011 |
Keywords
- marketing
- merkenbeleid
Research Focus Areas Hanze University of Applied Sciences
- Ondernemerschap
Publinova thema's
- Economie en Management
- Mens en Maatschappij
Vingerafdruk
Duik in de onderzoeksthema's van 'With or without you: consumer acceptance of two national brand portfolio extension options'. Samen vormen ze een unieke vingerafdruk.Citeer dit
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver