What makes audiences resilient to disinformation? Integrating micro, meso, and macro factors based on a systematic literature review

Jülide Kont (First author), Wim Elving, Marcel Broersma, Çiğdem Bozdağ

Onderzoeksoutput: ArticleAcademicpeer review

Samenvatting

Despite increased attention since 2015, there is little consensus on why audiences believe or share disinformation. In our study, we propose a shift in analytical perspective by applying the concept of resilience. Through a systematic literature review (n = 95), we identify factors that have been linked to individuals’ resilience and vulnerability to disinformation thus far. Our analysis reveals twelve factors: thinking styles, political ideology, worldview and beliefs, pathologies, knowledge, emotions, (social) media use, demographics, perceived control, trust, culture, and environment. By applying the results to the socio-ecological model (SEM), we provide a comprehensive view on what constitutes resilience to disinformation, delineate between different levels of influence, and identify relevant gaps in research. Our conceptualization contributes to an under-theorized field, in which the term resilience is much used yet rarely sufficiently defined.
Originele taal-2English
Pagina's (van-tot)1-22
Aantal pagina's22
TijdschriftCommunications: The European Journal of Communication Research
DOI's
StatusPublished - 16 mei 2024

Keywords

  • desinformatie
  • geloof in complottheorie
  • kwetsbaarheid
  • nepnieuws
  • verkeerde informatie
  • weerstand

Vingerafdruk

Duik in de onderzoeksthema's van 'What makes audiences resilient to disinformation? Integrating micro, meso, and macro factors based on a systematic literature review'. Samen vormen ze een unieke vingerafdruk.

Citeer dit