Activiteiten per jaar
Samenvatting
Despite increased attention since 2015, there is little consensus on why audiences believe or share disinformation. In our study, we propose a shift in analytical perspective by applying the concept of resilience. Through a systematic literature review (n = 95), we identify factors that have been linked to individuals’ resilience and vulnerability to disinformation thus far. Our analysis reveals twelve factors: thinking styles, political ideology, worldview and beliefs, pathologies, knowledge, emotions, (social) media use, demographics, perceived control, trust, culture, and environment. By applying the results to the socio-ecological model (SEM), we provide a comprehensive view on what constitutes resilience to disinformation, delineate between different levels of influence, and identify relevant gaps in research. Our conceptualization contributes to an under-theorized field, in which the term resilience is much used yet rarely sufficiently defined.
Originele taal-2 | English |
---|---|
Pagina's (van-tot) | 1-22 |
Aantal pagina's | 22 |
Tijdschrift | Communications: The European Journal of Communication Research |
DOI's | |
Status | Published - 16 mei 2024 |
Keywords
- desinformatie
- geloof in complottheorie
- kwetsbaarheid
- nepnieuws
- verkeerde informatie
- weerstand
Vingerafdruk
Duik in de onderzoeksthema's van 'What makes audiences resilient to disinformation? Integrating micro, meso, and macro factors based on a systematic literature review'. Samen vormen ze een unieke vingerafdruk.Activiteiten
- 1 Participation in conference
-
ECREA Audience and Reception Studies Section
Jülide Kont (Speaker)
2023Activiteit: Participation in conference