Translation and cultural adaptation of the scored Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA©)

Randi Tobberup; Harriët Jager-Wittenaar; Jonas  Sørensen; Luise H. P.   Kopp; Pernille   Svarstad; Pia  Sætre; Faith D. Ottery

doi:10.1016/j.clnesp.2021.12.012

Translation and cultural adaptation of the scored Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA©)

Randi Tobberup (First author), Harriët Jager-Wittenaar, Jonas Sørensen, Luise H. P. Kopp, Pernille Svarstad, Pia Sætre, Faith D. Ottery

Malnutrition and Healthy Ageing

Onderzoeksoutput: Article › Academic › peer review

Samenvatting

Background and aim: The Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA©) is a globally used malnutrition screening, assessment, triage and monitoring tool. The aim of this study was to perform a linguistic and content validation of the translated and culturally adapted version of the PG-SGA for the Danish setting. Method: The study was conducted according to the International Society of Pharmaeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR) Principles of Good Practice for the Translational and Cultural Adaptation Process for Patient-Reported Outcomes Measures. Cancer patients (n = 121) and healthcare professionals (HCPs, n = 80) participated in the cognitive debriefing. A questionnaire was used in the cognitive debriefing in which comprehensibility, difficulty, and content validity (relevance) were quantified by a 4-point scale. Item and scale indices were calculated using the average item ratings divided by the number of respondents for content validity (Item-CVI, Scale-CVI), comprehensibility (Item-CI, Scale-CI) and difficulty (Item-DI, Scale-DI). As pre-defined, item indices

Originele taal-2	English
Pagina's (van-tot)	215-220
Aantal pagina's	6
Tijdschrift	Clinical Nutrition ESPEN
Volume	47
DOI's	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnesp.2021.12.012
Status	Published - feb. 2022

Keywords

symptomen van invloed van voeding
screening op ondervoeding
voedingsscreening
beoordeling van ondervoeding

Research Focus Areas Research Centre or Centre of Expertise

Kwetsbaarheid en passende zorg

Toegang tot document

10.1016/j.clnesp.2021.12.012Licentie: CC BY

Citeer dit

@article{80676f3272334b9e9a34d571fde256f3,

title = "Translation and cultural adaptation of the scored Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA{\textcopyright})",

abstract = "Background and aim: The Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA{\textcopyright}) is a globally used malnutrition screening, assessment, triage and monitoring tool. The aim of this study was to perform a linguistic and content validation of the translated and culturally adapted version of the PG-SGA for the Danish setting. Method: The study was conducted according to the International Society of Pharmaeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR) Principles of Good Practice for the Translational and Cultural Adaptation Process for Patient-Reported Outcomes Measures. Cancer patients (n = 121) and healthcare professionals (HCPs, n = 80) participated in the cognitive debriefing. A questionnaire was used in the cognitive debriefing in which comprehensibility, difficulty, and content validity (relevance) were quantified by a 4-point scale. Item and scale indices were calculated using the average item ratings divided by the number of respondents for content validity (Item-CVI, Scale-CVI), comprehensibility (Item-CI, Scale-CI) and difficulty (Item-DI, Scale-DI). As pre-defined, item indices ",

keywords = "nutrition impact symptoms, malnutrition screening, nutritional screening, malnutrition assessment, symptomen van invloed van voeding, screening op ondervoeding, voedingsscreening, beoordeling van ondervoeding",

author = "Randi Tobberup and Harri{\"e}t Jager-Wittenaar and Jonas S{\o}rensen and Kopp, {Luise H. P.} and Pernille Svarstad and Pia S{\ae}tre and Ottery, {Faith D.}",

year = "2022",

month = feb,

doi = "10.1016/j.clnesp.2021.12.012",

language = "English",

volume = "47",

pages = "215--220",

journal = "Clinical Nutrition ESPEN",

issn = "2405-4577",

publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Translation and cultural adaptation of the scored Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA©)

AU - Tobberup, Randi

AU - Jager-Wittenaar, Harriët

AU - Sørensen, Jonas

AU - Kopp, Luise H. P.

AU - Svarstad, Pernille

AU - Sætre, Pia

AU - Ottery, Faith D.

PY - 2022/2

Y1 - 2022/2

N2 - Background and aim: The Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA©) is a globally used malnutrition screening, assessment, triage and monitoring tool. The aim of this study was to perform a linguistic and content validation of the translated and culturally adapted version of the PG-SGA for the Danish setting. Method: The study was conducted according to the International Society of Pharmaeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR) Principles of Good Practice for the Translational and Cultural Adaptation Process for Patient-Reported Outcomes Measures. Cancer patients (n = 121) and healthcare professionals (HCPs, n = 80) participated in the cognitive debriefing. A questionnaire was used in the cognitive debriefing in which comprehensibility, difficulty, and content validity (relevance) were quantified by a 4-point scale. Item and scale indices were calculated using the average item ratings divided by the number of respondents for content validity (Item-CVI, Scale-CVI), comprehensibility (Item-CI, Scale-CI) and difficulty (Item-DI, Scale-DI). As pre-defined, item indices

AB - Background and aim: The Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA©) is a globally used malnutrition screening, assessment, triage and monitoring tool. The aim of this study was to perform a linguistic and content validation of the translated and culturally adapted version of the PG-SGA for the Danish setting. Method: The study was conducted according to the International Society of Pharmaeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR) Principles of Good Practice for the Translational and Cultural Adaptation Process for Patient-Reported Outcomes Measures. Cancer patients (n = 121) and healthcare professionals (HCPs, n = 80) participated in the cognitive debriefing. A questionnaire was used in the cognitive debriefing in which comprehensibility, difficulty, and content validity (relevance) were quantified by a 4-point scale. Item and scale indices were calculated using the average item ratings divided by the number of respondents for content validity (Item-CVI, Scale-CVI), comprehensibility (Item-CI, Scale-CI) and difficulty (Item-DI, Scale-DI). As pre-defined, item indices

KW - nutrition impact symptoms

KW - malnutrition screening

KW - nutritional screening

KW - malnutrition assessment

KW - symptomen van invloed van voeding

KW - screening op ondervoeding

KW - voedingsscreening

KW - beoordeling van ondervoeding

U2 - 10.1016/j.clnesp.2021.12.012

DO - 10.1016/j.clnesp.2021.12.012

M3 - Article

SN - 2405-4577

VL - 47

SP - 215

EP - 220

JO - Clinical Nutrition ESPEN

JF - Clinical Nutrition ESPEN

ER -

Translation and cultural adaptation of the scored Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA©)

Samenvatting

Keywords

Research Focus Areas Research Centre or Centre of Expertise

Toegang tot document

Vingerafdruk

Citeer dit