The influence of self-threats on fairness judgments and affective measures

Joost Miedema, Kees Van den Bos, Riël Vermunt

Onderzoeksoutput: ArticleAcademicpeer review

Uittreksel

This paper focuses on the question of why fairness matters to people. Extending on terror and uncertainty management theories and the literature on the self, it is proposed here that fairness can be a means of self-defense. Thinking of a situation that is threatening to the self therefore should make fairness a more important issue to people. The findings of two experiments support this line of reasoning: Asking participants to think about things that are threatening to themselves led to stronger reactions to manipulations of both procedural and distributive fairness. In the discussion it is argued that these findings suggest that fairness especially matters to people when they are trying to deal with threats to their selves.
Originele taal-2English
Pagina's (van-tot)229-253
TijdschriftSocial justice research
Volume19
Nummer van het tijdschrift2
DOI's
StatusPublished - jun 2006
Extern gepubliceerdJa

Keywords

  • zelf
  • rechtvaardigheid
  • sociale psychologie

Citeer dit

Miedema, Joost ; Van den Bos, Kees ; Vermunt, Riël. / The influence of self-threats on fairness judgments and affective measures. In: Social justice research. 2006 ; Vol. 19, Nr. 2. blz. 229-253.
@article{7efeb48fe922405e859ad6349f7091f4,
title = "The influence of self-threats on fairness judgments and affective measures",
abstract = "This paper focuses on the question of why fairness matters to people. Extending on terror and uncertainty management theories and the literature on the self, it is proposed here that fairness can be a means of self-defense. Thinking of a situation that is threatening to the self therefore should make fairness a more important issue to people. The findings of two experiments support this line of reasoning: Asking participants to think about things that are threatening to themselves led to stronger reactions to manipulations of both procedural and distributive fairness. In the discussion it is argued that these findings suggest that fairness especially matters to people when they are trying to deal with threats to their selves.",
keywords = "zelf, rechtvaardigheid, sociale psychologie, self, fairness, justice, social psychology",
author = "Joost Miedema and {Van den Bos}, Kees and Ri{\"e}l Vermunt",
year = "2006",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1007/s11211-006-0007-7",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
pages = "229--253",
journal = "Social justice research",
issn = "1573-6725",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "2",

}

The influence of self-threats on fairness judgments and affective measures. / Miedema, Joost; Van den Bos, Kees ; Vermunt, Riël.

In: Social justice research, Vol. 19, Nr. 2, 06.2006, blz. 229-253.

Onderzoeksoutput: ArticleAcademicpeer review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The influence of self-threats on fairness judgments and affective measures

AU - Miedema, Joost

AU - Van den Bos, Kees

AU - Vermunt, Riël

PY - 2006/6

Y1 - 2006/6

N2 - This paper focuses on the question of why fairness matters to people. Extending on terror and uncertainty management theories and the literature on the self, it is proposed here that fairness can be a means of self-defense. Thinking of a situation that is threatening to the self therefore should make fairness a more important issue to people. The findings of two experiments support this line of reasoning: Asking participants to think about things that are threatening to themselves led to stronger reactions to manipulations of both procedural and distributive fairness. In the discussion it is argued that these findings suggest that fairness especially matters to people when they are trying to deal with threats to their selves.

AB - This paper focuses on the question of why fairness matters to people. Extending on terror and uncertainty management theories and the literature on the self, it is proposed here that fairness can be a means of self-defense. Thinking of a situation that is threatening to the self therefore should make fairness a more important issue to people. The findings of two experiments support this line of reasoning: Asking participants to think about things that are threatening to themselves led to stronger reactions to manipulations of both procedural and distributive fairness. In the discussion it is argued that these findings suggest that fairness especially matters to people when they are trying to deal with threats to their selves.

KW - zelf

KW - rechtvaardigheid

KW - sociale psychologie

KW - self

KW - fairness

KW - justice

KW - social psychology

UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/influence-selfthreats-fairness-judgments-affective-measures

U2 - 10.1007/s11211-006-0007-7

DO - 10.1007/s11211-006-0007-7

M3 - Article

VL - 19

SP - 229

EP - 253

JO - Social justice research

JF - Social justice research

SN - 1573-6725

IS - 2

ER -