Doorgaan naar hoofdnavigatie Doorgaan naar zoeken Ga verder naar hoofdinhoud

Patient-reported scar quality in paediatric and adult burn patients: A long-term multicentre follow-up study

  • J Nicolaas Dijkshoorn
  • , Margriet E van Baar
  • , Anouk Pijpe
  • , Marianne Nieuwenhuis
  • , Harold Goei
  • , Cornelis H van der Vlies
  • , Inge Spronk
  • Maasstad Ziekenhuis - Brandwondencentrum Rotterdam
  • Association of Dutch Burn Centres, Burn Centre, Maasstad Hospital
  • Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Department of Public Health
  • Rode Kruis Ziekenhuis - Brandwondencentrum Beverwijk
  • Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit, Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery
  • Association of Dutch Burn Centres, Burn Centre, Red Cross Hospital
  • Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam Movement Sciences
  • Vereniging Samenwerkende Brandwondencentra in Nederland
  • Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, Universitair Medisch Centrum Groningen, Centrum voor Bewegingswetenschappen
  • Amsterdam UMC
  • Erasmus MC
  • Nederlandse Brandwonden Stichting

Onderzoeksoutput: Article › Academic › peer review

Samenvatting

Background: Burn scar maturation can take several years but is generally studied shortly after injury. Therefore, we investigated patient-reported scar quality up to 5–7 years post-burn. Methods: Patients with ≤ 20 % total body surface area burned completed the Patient Scale of the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS 2.0) on the same scar at 3, > 18 months (median 28 months) and 5–7 years (median 63 months) post-burn. Results: Fifty-eight patients (21 children; 37 adults) with a median total body surface area burned (TBSA) of 6.3 % participated. Average patient-reported scar quality (POSAS score) was generally worst at 3 months (median score: 4.2), best at 28 months (median score: 2.2) and intermediate at 63 months post-burn (median score: 3.4) (p < 0.001). Many patients (66 %) reported a median 1.8 point higher (worse) POSAS score at 63 months compared to 28 months post-burn, whereas 14 % reported an identical, and 21 % a lower (better) score. At any assessment, largest differences with normal skin were reported for scar colour. Univariate predictive factors of long-term patient-reported scar quality were scar quality at 3 months (p = 0.002) and 28 months post-burn (p < 0.001), full-thickness burn size (p = 0.033), length of hospital stay (p = 0.003), and number of surgeries (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Two-thirds of patients with burns up to 20 % TBSA scored the quality of their scars worse at 63 months compared to 28 months post-burn. Whether this corresponds to increased dissatisfaction with scars in the long term should be further investigated. These new insights add to the body of knowledge on scar maturation and underscores the importance of discussing patients’ expectations.
Originele taal-2English
TijdschriftBurns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries
Volume50
Nummer van het tijdschrift9
DOI's
StatusE-pub ahead of print - 10 jul. 2024

Duurzame ontwikkelingsdoelstellingen van de VN

Deze output draagt bij aan de volgende duurzame ontwikkelingsdoelstelling(en)

  1. SDG 03 – Goede gezondheid en welzijn
    SDG 03 – Goede gezondheid en welzijn

Keywords

  • brandwonden
  • door de patiënt gerapporteerde uitkomst
  • kwaliteit van littekens

Research Focus Areas Hanze University of Applied Sciences

  • Healthy Ageing

Research Focus Areas Research Centre or Centre of Expertise

  • Kwetsbaarheid en passende zorg

Publinova thema's

  • Overig
  • Gezondheid

Vingerafdruk

Duik in de onderzoeksthema's van 'Patient-reported scar quality in paediatric and adult burn patients: A long-term multicentre follow-up study'. Samen vormen ze een unieke vingerafdruk.

Citeer dit