Doorgaan naar hoofdnavigatie Doorgaan naar zoeken Ga verder naar hoofdinhoud

Facilitators & barriers and practices of early mobilization in critically ill burn patients: a survey

  • Y Dikkema
  • , L J Mouton
  • , B Cleffken
  • , E de Jong
  • , M E van Baar
  • , A Pijpe
  • , C P van der Schans
  • , S M J H Scholten
  • , M van der Steen-Dieperink
  • , M K Nieuwenhuis
  • , Anuschka Niemeijer
  • Martini Ziekenhuis - Brandwondencentrum Groningen
  • Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, Universitair Medisch Centrum Groningen, Afdeling Bewegingswetenschappen
  • Maasstad Hospital, Department of Intensive Care
  • Red Cross Hospital, Department of Intensive Care
  • Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam, Department of Medical Psychology and Psychotherapy
  • Association of Dutch Burn Centres, Burn Centre, Maasstad Hospital
  • Rode Kruis Ziekenhuis - Brandwondencentrum Beverwijk
  • Vereniging Samenwerkende Brandwondencentra in Nederland
  • Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, Universitair Medisch Centrum Groningen, Centrum voor Revalidatie
  • Martini Ziekenhuis, Intensive Care

Onderzoeksoutput: Article › Academic › peer review

Samenvatting

BACKGROUND: Early mobilization (EM) of intensive care (IC) patients is important but complex with facilitators and barriers. Compared to general IC patients, burn IC patients are more hyper-metabolic. They have extensive wounds, lengthy wound dressing changes, and repeated surgeries that may affect possibilities of EM. This study aimed to identify facilitators and barriers of EM in burn IC patients among all disciplines involved. Additionally, we assessed EM practices, i.e. when are which patients considered suitable for EM.

METHODS: A survey was sent to 139 professionals involved in EM of burn IC patients (discipline groups: Intensivists, medical doctors, registered nurses, therapists).

RESULTS: Response rate was 57 %. The majority found EM very important, yet different definitions were chosen. Perceived barriers mainly concerned patient-level factors, most frequently hemodynamic instability and excessive sedation followed by skin graft surgery, fatigue, and pain management. Most frequent barriers at the provider-level were limited staffing, safety concerns, and conflicting perceptions about the suitability of EM. At the institutional-level, we found no high barriers. Interdisciplinary variation on perceived barriers, when to initiate it, and permitted maximal activity were ascertained.

CONCLUSION: Skin grafts and pain management were barriers of EM specific for burn care. Opinions on frequency, dosage and duration of EM varied widely. Improving interdisciplinary communication is key.

Originele taal-2English
Pagina's (van-tot)42-54
Aantal pagina's13
TijdschriftBurns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries
Volume49
Nummer van het tijdschrift1
DOI's
StatusE-pub ahead of print - 6 sep. 2022

Duurzame ontwikkelingsdoelstellingen van de VN

Deze output draagt bij aan de volgende duurzame ontwikkelingsdoelstelling(en)

  1. SDG 03 – Goede gezondheid en welzijn
    SDG 03 – Goede gezondheid en welzijn
  2. SDG 17 - Partnerschap om de doelen te bereiken
    SDG 17 Partnerschap om de doelen te bereiken

Research Focus Areas Hanze University of Applied Sciences

  • Healthy Ageing

Research Focus Areas Research Centre or Centre of Expertise

  • Kwetsbaarheid en passende zorg

Publinova thema's

  • Overig

Vingerafdruk

Duik in de onderzoeksthema's van 'Facilitators & barriers and practices of early mobilization in critically ill burn patients: a survey'. Samen vormen ze een unieke vingerafdruk.

Citeer dit