Written pain neuroscience education in fibromyalgia: a multicenter randomized controlled trial

Miriam van Ittersum, C. Paul van Wilgen, Cees van der Schans, Luc Lambrecht, Johan W. Groothoff, Jo Nijs

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Mounting evidence supports the use of face-to-face pain neuroscience education for the treatment of chronic pain patients. This study aimed at examining whether written education about pain neuroscience improves illness perceptions, catastrophizing, and health status in patients with fibromyalgia. A double-blind, multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial with 6-month follow-up was conducted. Patients with FM (n = 114) that consented to participate were randomly allocated to receive either written pain neuroscience education or written relaxation training. Written pain neuroscience education comprised of a booklet with pain neuroscience education plus a telephone call to clarify any difficulties; the relaxation group received a booklet with relaxation education and a telephone call. The revised illness perception questionnaire, Pain Catastrophizing Scale, and fibromyalgia impact questionnaire were used as outcome measures. Both patients and assessors were blinded. Repeated-measures analyses with last observation carried forward principle were performed. Cohen's d effect sizes (ES) were calculated for all within-group changes and between-group differences. The results reveal that written pain neuroscience education does not change the impact of FM on daily life, catastrophizing, or perceived symptoms of patients with FM. Compared with written relaxation training, written pain neuroscience education improved beliefs in a chronic timeline of FM (P = 0.03; ES = 0.50), but it does not impact upon other domains of illness perceptions. Compared with written relaxation training, written pain neuroscience education slightly improved illness perceptions of patients with FM, but it did not impart clinically meaningful effects on pain, catastrophizing, or the impact of FM on daily life. Face-to-face sessions of pain neuroscience education are required to change inappropriate cognitions and perceived health in patients with FM.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)689-700
JournalPain practice
Volume14
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2014

Keywords

  • chronic pain
  • fibromyalgia
  • neurophysiology
  • illness perceptions
  • randomized controlled trial

Cite this

van Ittersum, Miriam ; van Wilgen, C. Paul ; van der Schans, Cees ; Lambrecht, Luc ; Groothoff, Johan W. ; Nijs, Jo. / Written pain neuroscience education in fibromyalgia : a multicenter randomized controlled trial. In: Pain practice. 2014 ; Vol. 14, No. 8. pp. 689-700.
@article{b078ed0de4f44db99e44bf998e2a205f,
title = "Written pain neuroscience education in fibromyalgia: a multicenter randomized controlled trial",
abstract = "Mounting evidence supports the use of face-to-face pain neuroscience education for the treatment of chronic pain patients. This study aimed at examining whether written education about pain neuroscience improves illness perceptions, catastrophizing, and health status in patients with fibromyalgia. A double-blind, multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial with 6-month follow-up was conducted. Patients with FM (n = 114) that consented to participate were randomly allocated to receive either written pain neuroscience education or written relaxation training. Written pain neuroscience education comprised of a booklet with pain neuroscience education plus a telephone call to clarify any difficulties; the relaxation group received a booklet with relaxation education and a telephone call. The revised illness perception questionnaire, Pain Catastrophizing Scale, and fibromyalgia impact questionnaire were used as outcome measures. Both patients and assessors were blinded. Repeated-measures analyses with last observation carried forward principle were performed. Cohen's d effect sizes (ES) were calculated for all within-group changes and between-group differences. The results reveal that written pain neuroscience education does not change the impact of FM on daily life, catastrophizing, or perceived symptoms of patients with FM. Compared with written relaxation training, written pain neuroscience education improved beliefs in a chronic timeline of FM (P = 0.03; ES = 0.50), but it does not impact upon other domains of illness perceptions. Compared with written relaxation training, written pain neuroscience education slightly improved illness perceptions of patients with FM, but it did not impart clinically meaningful effects on pain, catastrophizing, or the impact of FM on daily life. Face-to-face sessions of pain neuroscience education are required to change inappropriate cognitions and perceived health in patients with FM.",
keywords = "chronische pijn, fibromyalgie, neurofysiologie, chronic pain, fibromyalgia, neurophysiology, illness perceptions, randomized controlled trial",
author = "{van Ittersum}, Miriam and {van Wilgen}, {C. Paul} and {van der Schans}, Cees and Luc Lambrecht and Groothoff, {Johan W.} and Jo Nijs",
note = "{\circledC} 2013 World Institute of Pain.",
year = "2014",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1111/papr.12137",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
pages = "689--700",
journal = "Pain practice",
issn = "1530-7085",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "8",

}

Written pain neuroscience education in fibromyalgia : a multicenter randomized controlled trial. / van Ittersum, Miriam; van Wilgen, C. Paul; van der Schans, Cees; Lambrecht, Luc; Groothoff, Johan W.; Nijs, Jo.

In: Pain practice, Vol. 14, No. 8, 11.2014, p. 689-700.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Written pain neuroscience education in fibromyalgia

T2 - a multicenter randomized controlled trial

AU - van Ittersum, Miriam

AU - van Wilgen, C. Paul

AU - van der Schans, Cees

AU - Lambrecht, Luc

AU - Groothoff, Johan W.

AU - Nijs, Jo

N1 - © 2013 World Institute of Pain.

PY - 2014/11

Y1 - 2014/11

N2 - Mounting evidence supports the use of face-to-face pain neuroscience education for the treatment of chronic pain patients. This study aimed at examining whether written education about pain neuroscience improves illness perceptions, catastrophizing, and health status in patients with fibromyalgia. A double-blind, multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial with 6-month follow-up was conducted. Patients with FM (n = 114) that consented to participate were randomly allocated to receive either written pain neuroscience education or written relaxation training. Written pain neuroscience education comprised of a booklet with pain neuroscience education plus a telephone call to clarify any difficulties; the relaxation group received a booklet with relaxation education and a telephone call. The revised illness perception questionnaire, Pain Catastrophizing Scale, and fibromyalgia impact questionnaire were used as outcome measures. Both patients and assessors were blinded. Repeated-measures analyses with last observation carried forward principle were performed. Cohen's d effect sizes (ES) were calculated for all within-group changes and between-group differences. The results reveal that written pain neuroscience education does not change the impact of FM on daily life, catastrophizing, or perceived symptoms of patients with FM. Compared with written relaxation training, written pain neuroscience education improved beliefs in a chronic timeline of FM (P = 0.03; ES = 0.50), but it does not impact upon other domains of illness perceptions. Compared with written relaxation training, written pain neuroscience education slightly improved illness perceptions of patients with FM, but it did not impart clinically meaningful effects on pain, catastrophizing, or the impact of FM on daily life. Face-to-face sessions of pain neuroscience education are required to change inappropriate cognitions and perceived health in patients with FM.

AB - Mounting evidence supports the use of face-to-face pain neuroscience education for the treatment of chronic pain patients. This study aimed at examining whether written education about pain neuroscience improves illness perceptions, catastrophizing, and health status in patients with fibromyalgia. A double-blind, multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial with 6-month follow-up was conducted. Patients with FM (n = 114) that consented to participate were randomly allocated to receive either written pain neuroscience education or written relaxation training. Written pain neuroscience education comprised of a booklet with pain neuroscience education plus a telephone call to clarify any difficulties; the relaxation group received a booklet with relaxation education and a telephone call. The revised illness perception questionnaire, Pain Catastrophizing Scale, and fibromyalgia impact questionnaire were used as outcome measures. Both patients and assessors were blinded. Repeated-measures analyses with last observation carried forward principle were performed. Cohen's d effect sizes (ES) were calculated for all within-group changes and between-group differences. The results reveal that written pain neuroscience education does not change the impact of FM on daily life, catastrophizing, or perceived symptoms of patients with FM. Compared with written relaxation training, written pain neuroscience education improved beliefs in a chronic timeline of FM (P = 0.03; ES = 0.50), but it does not impact upon other domains of illness perceptions. Compared with written relaxation training, written pain neuroscience education slightly improved illness perceptions of patients with FM, but it did not impart clinically meaningful effects on pain, catastrophizing, or the impact of FM on daily life. Face-to-face sessions of pain neuroscience education are required to change inappropriate cognitions and perceived health in patients with FM.

KW - chronische pijn

KW - fibromyalgie

KW - neurofysiologie

KW - chronic pain

KW - fibromyalgia

KW - neurophysiology

KW - illness perceptions

KW - randomized controlled trial

U2 - 10.1111/papr.12137

DO - 10.1111/papr.12137

M3 - Article

VL - 14

SP - 689

EP - 700

JO - Pain practice

JF - Pain practice

SN - 1530-7085

IS - 8

ER -