Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

When “lying flat” goes quiet: active and passive pathways linking “Tang Ping” suppression to displaced voice and hidden disengagement

  • University of Groningen, Faculty of Behavioural and Social Sciences, Department of Psychology

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

16 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Tang Ping (躺平, TP), or “lying flat,” has emerged among Chinese youth as an embedded response to overwork, involution, blocked mobility, and declining confidence that sustained effort will secure adult roles and material stability. This Perspective asks what may happen when institutions and platforms restrict the visibility, legitimacy, or circulation of TP expression without changing the pressures that made it meaningful. It introduces the Tang Ping Differentiated Pathways Framework (TP-DPF), a conceptual model of function-contingent responses to suppression. The framework distinguishes three manifestations of TP: discourse, self-identification, and practice. Its originality lies in combining this manifestation-function distinction with function-contingent divergence after suppression. When TP expression serves active boundary-setting and retains agency, suppression may evoke autonomy-threat appraisal, freedom-restoration motivation, and displaced voice through coded, private, anonymous, or symbolic expression. When TP expression reflects passive, despair-driven withdrawal and low efficacy, suppression may instead reinforce voice-futility appraisal, futility-based withholding, and intensified hidden disengagement. Self-determination theory differentiates the two functions; psychological reactance theory explains the active pathway; and voice-and-silence theory explains the passive pathway. Chinese relational obligations, moralized striving, class-linked resources, and state-platform visibility governance may condition discourse-practice correspondence and post-suppression pathways. The article specifies construct definitions, multilevel boundary conditions, operational propositions, sampling and measurement strategies, instruments, and analytical designs. It concludes cautiously that reduced public TP discourse by itself cannot demonstrate motivational recovery because expression may diverge from practice, active voice may be displaced, and passive withdrawal may deepen.
Original languageEnglish
Article number1877139
Pages (from-to)1-15
Number of pages15
JournalFrontiers in Sociology
Volume11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 25 Aug 2026

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 03 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 03 Good Health and Well-being
  2. SDG 08 - Decent Work and Economic Growth
    SDG 08 Decent Work and Economic Growth
  3. SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
    SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

Keywords

  • China
  • TP discourse
  • TP practice
  • Tang Ping
  • censorship
  • lying flat
  • psychological reactance
  • self-determination theory
  • sociology
  • suppression

Research Focus Areas Hanze University of Applied Sciences * (mandatory by Hanze)

  • Entrepreneurship
  • Healthy Ageing

Research Focus Areas Research Centre or Centre of Expertise * (mandatory by Hanze)

  • Human Capital

Publinova themes

  • People and Society

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'When “lying flat” goes quiet: active and passive pathways linking “Tang Ping” suppression to displaced voice and hidden disengagement'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this