TY - JOUR
T1 - What makes audiences resilient to disinformation?
T2 - Integrating micro, meso, and macro factors based on a systematic literature review
AU - Kont, Jülide
AU - Elving, Wim
AU - Broersma, Marcel
AU - Bozdağ, Çiğdem
N1 - Jülide Kont is a Ph.D. candidate and lecturer at the Hanze University of Applied Sciences and the University of Groningen. Her research focuses on disinformation from a cross-national and comparative perspective.
PY - 2024/5/16
Y1 - 2024/5/16
N2 - Despite increased attention since 2015, there is little consensus on why audiences believe or share disinformation. In our study, we propose a shift in analytical perspective by applying the concept of resilience. Through a systematic literature review (n = 95), we identify factors that have been linked to individuals’ resilience and vulnerability to disinformation thus far. Our analysis reveals twelve factors: thinking styles, political ideology, worldview and beliefs, pathologies, knowledge, emotions, (social) media use, demographics, perceived control, trust, culture, and environment. By applying the results to the socio-ecological model (SEM), we provide a comprehensive view on what constitutes resilience to disinformation, delineate between different levels of influence, and identify relevant gaps in research. Our conceptualization contributes to an under-theorized field, in which the term resilience is much used yet rarely sufficiently defined.
AB - Despite increased attention since 2015, there is little consensus on why audiences believe or share disinformation. In our study, we propose a shift in analytical perspective by applying the concept of resilience. Through a systematic literature review (n = 95), we identify factors that have been linked to individuals’ resilience and vulnerability to disinformation thus far. Our analysis reveals twelve factors: thinking styles, political ideology, worldview and beliefs, pathologies, knowledge, emotions, (social) media use, demographics, perceived control, trust, culture, and environment. By applying the results to the socio-ecological model (SEM), we provide a comprehensive view on what constitutes resilience to disinformation, delineate between different levels of influence, and identify relevant gaps in research. Our conceptualization contributes to an under-theorized field, in which the term resilience is much used yet rarely sufficiently defined.
KW - desinformatie
KW - geloof in complottheorie
KW - kwetsbaarheid
KW - nepnieuws
KW - verkeerde informatie
KW - weerstand
KW - conspiracy theory belief
KW - disinformation
KW - fake news
KW - misinformation
KW - resilience
KW - vulnerability
U2 - 10.1515/commun-2023-0078
DO - 10.1515/commun-2023-0078
M3 - Article
SN - 1613-4087
VL - 50
SP - 1
EP - 22
JO - Communications: The European Journal of Communication Research
JF - Communications: The European Journal of Communication Research
IS - 2
ER -