Translation and cultural adaptation of the scored Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA©)

Randi Tobberup; Harriët Jager-Wittenaar; Jonas  Sørensen; Luise H. P.   Kopp; Pernille   Svarstad; Pia  Sætre; Faith D. Ottery

doi:10.1016/j.clnesp.2021.12.012

Translation and cultural adaptation of the scored Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA©)

Randi Tobberup (First author), Harriët Jager-Wittenaar, Jonas Sørensen, Luise H. P. Kopp, Pernille Svarstad, Pia Sætre, Faith D. Ottery

Malnutrition and Healthy Ageing

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

Abstract

Background and aim: The Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA©) is a globally used malnutrition screening, assessment, triage and monitoring tool. The aim of this study was to perform a linguistic and content validation of the translated and culturally adapted version of the PG-SGA for the Danish setting. Method: The study was conducted according to the International Society of Pharmaeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR) Principles of Good Practice for the Translational and Cultural Adaptation Process for Patient-Reported Outcomes Measures. Cancer patients (n = 121) and healthcare professionals (HCPs, n = 80) participated in the cognitive debriefing. A questionnaire was used in the cognitive debriefing in which comprehensibility, difficulty, and content validity (relevance) were quantified by a 4-point scale. Item and scale indices were calculated using the average item ratings divided by the number of respondents for content validity (Item-CVI, Scale-CVI), comprehensibility (Item-CI, Scale-CI) and difficulty (Item-DI, Scale-DI). As pre-defined, item indices

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	215-220
Number of pages	6
Journal	Clinical Nutrition ESPEN
Volume	47
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnesp.2021.12.012
Publication status	Published - Feb 2022

Keywords

nutrition impact symptoms
malnutrition screening
nutritional screening
malnutrition assessment

Research Focus Areas Hanze University of Applied Sciences * (mandatory by Hanze)

Healthy Ageing

Research Focus Areas Research Centre or Centre of Expertise * (mandatory by Hanze)

Frailty and adequate care

Publinova themes

Other
Health

Access to Document

10.1016/j.clnesp.2021.12.012Licence: CC BY

Cite this

@article{80676f3272334b9e9a34d571fde256f3,

title = "Translation and cultural adaptation of the scored Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA{\textcopyright})",

abstract = "Background and aim: The Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA{\textcopyright}) is a globally used malnutrition screening, assessment, triage and monitoring tool. The aim of this study was to perform a linguistic and content validation of the translated and culturally adapted version of the PG-SGA for the Danish setting. Method: The study was conducted according to the International Society of Pharmaeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR) Principles of Good Practice for the Translational and Cultural Adaptation Process for Patient-Reported Outcomes Measures. Cancer patients (n = 121) and healthcare professionals (HCPs, n = 80) participated in the cognitive debriefing. A questionnaire was used in the cognitive debriefing in which comprehensibility, difficulty, and content validity (relevance) were quantified by a 4-point scale. Item and scale indices were calculated using the average item ratings divided by the number of respondents for content validity (Item-CVI, Scale-CVI), comprehensibility (Item-CI, Scale-CI) and difficulty (Item-DI, Scale-DI). As pre-defined, item indices ",

keywords = "nutrition impact symptoms, malnutrition screening, nutritional screening, malnutrition assessment, symptomen van invloed van voeding, screening op ondervoeding, voedingsscreening, beoordeling van ondervoeding",

author = "Randi Tobberup and Harri{\"e}t Jager-Wittenaar and Jonas S{\o}rensen and Kopp, \{Luise H. P.\} and Pernille Svarstad and Pia S{\ae}tre and Ottery, \{Faith D.\}",

year = "2022",

month = feb,

doi = "10.1016/j.clnesp.2021.12.012",

language = "English",

volume = "47",

pages = "215--220",

journal = "Clinical Nutrition ESPEN",

issn = "2405-4577",

publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Translation and cultural adaptation of the scored Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA©)

AU - Tobberup, Randi

AU - Jager-Wittenaar, Harriët

AU - Sørensen, Jonas

AU - Kopp, Luise H. P.

AU - Svarstad, Pernille

AU - Sætre, Pia

AU - Ottery, Faith D.

PY - 2022/2

Y1 - 2022/2

N2 - Background and aim: The Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA©) is a globally used malnutrition screening, assessment, triage and monitoring tool. The aim of this study was to perform a linguistic and content validation of the translated and culturally adapted version of the PG-SGA for the Danish setting. Method: The study was conducted according to the International Society of Pharmaeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR) Principles of Good Practice for the Translational and Cultural Adaptation Process for Patient-Reported Outcomes Measures. Cancer patients (n = 121) and healthcare professionals (HCPs, n = 80) participated in the cognitive debriefing. A questionnaire was used in the cognitive debriefing in which comprehensibility, difficulty, and content validity (relevance) were quantified by a 4-point scale. Item and scale indices were calculated using the average item ratings divided by the number of respondents for content validity (Item-CVI, Scale-CVI), comprehensibility (Item-CI, Scale-CI) and difficulty (Item-DI, Scale-DI). As pre-defined, item indices

AB - Background and aim: The Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA©) is a globally used malnutrition screening, assessment, triage and monitoring tool. The aim of this study was to perform a linguistic and content validation of the translated and culturally adapted version of the PG-SGA for the Danish setting. Method: The study was conducted according to the International Society of Pharmaeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR) Principles of Good Practice for the Translational and Cultural Adaptation Process for Patient-Reported Outcomes Measures. Cancer patients (n = 121) and healthcare professionals (HCPs, n = 80) participated in the cognitive debriefing. A questionnaire was used in the cognitive debriefing in which comprehensibility, difficulty, and content validity (relevance) were quantified by a 4-point scale. Item and scale indices were calculated using the average item ratings divided by the number of respondents for content validity (Item-CVI, Scale-CVI), comprehensibility (Item-CI, Scale-CI) and difficulty (Item-DI, Scale-DI). As pre-defined, item indices

KW - nutrition impact symptoms

KW - malnutrition screening

KW - nutritional screening

KW - malnutrition assessment

KW - symptomen van invloed van voeding

KW - screening op ondervoeding

KW - voedingsscreening

KW - beoordeling van ondervoeding

U2 - 10.1016/j.clnesp.2021.12.012

DO - 10.1016/j.clnesp.2021.12.012

M3 - Article

SN - 2405-4577

VL - 47

SP - 215

EP - 220

JO - Clinical Nutrition ESPEN

JF - Clinical Nutrition ESPEN

ER -

Translation and cultural adaptation of the scored Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA©)

Abstract

Keywords

Research Focus Areas Hanze University of Applied Sciences * (mandatory by Hanze)

Research Focus Areas Research Centre or Centre of Expertise * (mandatory by Hanze)

Publinova themes

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this