Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The effect of group cohesion on rehabilitation outcome in cancer survivors

  • Anne M May
  • , Hugo J Duivenvoorden
  • , Irene Korstjens
  • , Ellen van Weert
  • , Josette E H M Hoekstra-Weebers
  • , Bart van den Borne
  • , Ilse Mesters
  • , Cees P. van der Schans
  • , Wynand J G Ros
  • Utrecht University, University Medical Center Utrecht, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care
  • Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam, Department of Medical Psychology and Psychotherapy
  • Maastricht University, Department of Health Education and Promotion
  • Comprehensive Cancer Centre North-Netherlands
  • University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Center for Rehabilitation
  • University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Wenckebach Institute
  • UMC Utrecht, Julius Center

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Objective: Group-based physical training interventions have been shown to be effective in increasing quality of life in cancer survivors. Until now, however, the impact of cohesion within the group on intervention outcome has not been investigated. Methods: We examined self-reported individual group cohesion ratings collected in the first half of a 12-week rehabilitation programme for cancer survivors (N = 132). Four dimensions of group cohesion were measured, i.e. the bond with the group as whole, the bond with other members, cooperation within the group and the instrumental value. Quality of life, physical functioning and fatigue were assessed before and after the intervention using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-C30. Linear multiple multivariate regression analysis was conducted to explore the relationship between group cohesion and intervention outcome. Results: The relationship between group cohesion and outcome was significantly modified by gender. Higher ratings of cooperation within the group predicted better post-intervention quality of life and physical functioning and less fatigue in men, and better quality of life and physical functioning in women. Additionally, women who reported a stronger bond with other members showed a lower quality of life after the intervention. No relationship was found between the instrumental value and the outcome variables. Conclusion: Some dimensions of group cohesion seem to be associated with intervention outcome. The underlying mechanisms need to be unravelled. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)917-925
Number of pages9
JournalPsycho-Oncology
Volume17
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 19 Dec 2007

Keywords

  • cancer
  • rehabilitation
  • group dynamics

Research Focus Areas Hanze University of Applied Sciences * (mandatory by Hanze)

  • Healthy Ageing

Research Focus Areas Research Centre or Centre of Expertise * (mandatory by Hanze)

  • Frailty and adequate care

Publinova themes

  • Other

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The effect of group cohesion on rehabilitation outcome in cancer survivors'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this