Tensions in work integration social enterprises in The Netherlands: balancing social and commercial goals in a multi-stakeholder context

Drupsteen Linda, Erzsi Meerstra-de Haan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Purpose – Social enterprises have proven to play a vital role in the transitions towards inclusive labour markets and sustainable economies. Yet, they often struggle to flourish within traditional economic systems due to the dual mission of pursuing social and commercial goals, leading to inherent tensions for social entrepreneurs. This study aims to explore tensions within work integration social enterprises (WISEs) arising from their dual mission and engagement with multiple stakeholders.
Design/methodology/approach – Interviews with representatives from ten Dutch WISEs were conducted to understand their day-to-day challenges. The typology by Smith and Lewis (2011), focusing on learning, belonging, organising and performing tensions, was used for data analysis.
Findings – The study reveals tensions between social impact and commercial viability, with organisational challenges being predominant. Also, there is an observed temporal pattern in tension prominence: early stages emphasise belonging, organising and performing tensions, while learning tensions become more prominent as
enterprises mature.
Originality/value – This study offers insights into tensions within WISEs, highlighting the complexity of managing multiple identities in a multi-stakeholder context. By drawing on practical experiences, it contributes nuanced understanding to existing literature.
Original languageEnglish
JournalSocial Enterprise Journal
Early online date12 Sept 2024
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 12 Sept 2024

Keywords

  • arbeidsintegratie sociale onderneming
  • dubbele missie
  • spanningen
  • multi-belanghebbenden

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Tensions in work integration social enterprises in The Netherlands: balancing social and commercial goals in a multi-stakeholder context'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this