Task structure, need for structure, and creativity

Eric F. Rietzschel, Marjette Slijkhuis, Nico W. van Yperen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Although creativity is often seen as requiring spontaneity and flexibility, recent work suggests that there is creative potential in a structured and systematic approach as well. In a series of four experiments, we show that when Personal Need for Structure (PNS) is high, either chronic (Study 1) or situationally induced (Study 2), creative performance benefits from high task structure. Further, in line with earlier work on cognitive fixation effects, we show that when high task structure contains an example of noncreative task execution, creative performance is impaired, regardless of individuals' PNS. Nevertheless, participants high in PNS react relatively favorably to high task structure (Study 3) and are more likely to adopt a structured task approach when given the choice (Study 4). In sum, our results show that task structure can both stimulate and inhibit creative performance, particularly for people high in need for structure. © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)386-399
JournalEuropean journal of social psychology
Volume44
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Keywords

  • creativity

Cite this

Rietzschel, E. F., Slijkhuis, M., & van Yperen, N. W. (2014). Task structure, need for structure, and creativity. European journal of social psychology, 44(4), 386-399. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2024
Rietzschel, Eric F. ; Slijkhuis, Marjette ; van Yperen, Nico W. / Task structure, need for structure, and creativity. In: European journal of social psychology. 2014 ; Vol. 44, No. 4. pp. 386-399.
@article{e1efde257e7048deb50b557d5b4db9f2,
title = "Task structure, need for structure, and creativity",
abstract = "Although creativity is often seen as requiring spontaneity and flexibility, recent work suggests that there is creative potential in a structured and systematic approach as well. In a series of four experiments, we show that when Personal Need for Structure (PNS) is high, either chronic (Study 1) or situationally induced (Study 2), creative performance benefits from high task structure. Further, in line with earlier work on cognitive fixation effects, we show that when high task structure contains an example of noncreative task execution, creative performance is impaired, regardless of individuals' PNS. Nevertheless, participants high in PNS react relatively favorably to high task structure (Study 3) and are more likely to adopt a structured task approach when given the choice (Study 4). In sum, our results show that task structure can both stimulate and inhibit creative performance, particularly for people high in need for structure. {\circledC} 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.",
keywords = "creativity, creativiteit",
author = "Rietzschel, {Eric F.} and Marjette Slijkhuis and {van Yperen}, {Nico W.}",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1002/ejsp.2024",
language = "English",
volume = "44",
pages = "386--399",
journal = "European journal of social psychology",
issn = "1099-0992",
publisher = "Wiley",
number = "4",

}

Rietzschel, EF, Slijkhuis, M & van Yperen, NW 2014, 'Task structure, need for structure, and creativity' European journal of social psychology, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 386-399. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2024

Task structure, need for structure, and creativity. / Rietzschel, Eric F.; Slijkhuis, Marjette; van Yperen, Nico W.

In: European journal of social psychology, Vol. 44, No. 4, 2014, p. 386-399.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Task structure, need for structure, and creativity

AU - Rietzschel, Eric F.

AU - Slijkhuis, Marjette

AU - van Yperen, Nico W.

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Although creativity is often seen as requiring spontaneity and flexibility, recent work suggests that there is creative potential in a structured and systematic approach as well. In a series of four experiments, we show that when Personal Need for Structure (PNS) is high, either chronic (Study 1) or situationally induced (Study 2), creative performance benefits from high task structure. Further, in line with earlier work on cognitive fixation effects, we show that when high task structure contains an example of noncreative task execution, creative performance is impaired, regardless of individuals' PNS. Nevertheless, participants high in PNS react relatively favorably to high task structure (Study 3) and are more likely to adopt a structured task approach when given the choice (Study 4). In sum, our results show that task structure can both stimulate and inhibit creative performance, particularly for people high in need for structure. © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

AB - Although creativity is often seen as requiring spontaneity and flexibility, recent work suggests that there is creative potential in a structured and systematic approach as well. In a series of four experiments, we show that when Personal Need for Structure (PNS) is high, either chronic (Study 1) or situationally induced (Study 2), creative performance benefits from high task structure. Further, in line with earlier work on cognitive fixation effects, we show that when high task structure contains an example of noncreative task execution, creative performance is impaired, regardless of individuals' PNS. Nevertheless, participants high in PNS react relatively favorably to high task structure (Study 3) and are more likely to adopt a structured task approach when given the choice (Study 4). In sum, our results show that task structure can both stimulate and inhibit creative performance, particularly for people high in need for structure. © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

KW - creativity

KW - creativiteit

UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/task-structure-need-structure-creativity

U2 - 10.1002/ejsp.2024

DO - 10.1002/ejsp.2024

M3 - Article

VL - 44

SP - 386

EP - 399

JO - European journal of social psychology

JF - European journal of social psychology

SN - 1099-0992

IS - 4

ER -