Systematic academic instruction for students with EBD: the construction and use of a tool for teachers

Lidy van der Worp-van der Kamp; S.J. Pijl; Wendy J. Post; Els van den Bosch; Jan Bijstra

doi:10.1111/1471-3802.12096

Systematic academic instruction for students with EBD: the construction and use of a tool for teachers

Lidy van der Worp-van der Kamp
, S.J. Pijl
, Wendy J. Post
, Els van den Bosch
, Jan Bijstra

Diversity in Learning and Behavior

RENN4

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

Abstract

Educating students with behavioural, emotional and social difficulties requires a thorough systematic approach with the focus on academic instruction. This study addresses the development of a tool, consisting of two questionnaires, for measuring systematic academic instruction. The questionnaires cover the Plan-Do-Check-Act cycle and academic versus behavioural instruction. The questionnaires are both practically oriented as well as theoretically well founded. The reliability turned out to be acceptable (0.76) to high (0.89). Observation scales were developed to determine the validity of both questionnaires. Moderate correlations between questionnaires and observation scales were found (0.31, 0.32). Bland–Altman plots offered us valuable information about the differences between questionnaires and observation scales, supplying us with important issues for further research. It is concluded that the questionnaires might be a valuable tool for assessing teachers' systematic academic instruction.
DOI: 10.1111/1471-3802.12096

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	31-40
Number of pages	10
Journal	Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs
Volume	17
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-3802.12096
Publication status	Published - 1 Jan 2017

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

SDG 04 Quality Education

Keywords

higher education
teaching
students
behavioural problems
questionnaires

Research Focus Areas Hanze University of Applied Sciences * (mandatory by Hanze)

Healthy Ageing

Research Focus Areas Research Centre or Centre of Expertise * (mandatory by Hanze)

Equality of opportunity and participation

Publinova themes

Other
People and Society
Education and Teaching

Access to Document

10.1111/1471-3802.12096Licence: Unspecified

Cite this

@article{a464febce73546539ea433fb1644e027,

title = "Systematic academic instruction for students with EBD: the construction and use of a tool for teachers",

abstract = "Educating students with behavioural, emotional and social difficulties requires a thorough systematic approach with the focus on academic instruction. This study addresses the development of a tool, consisting of two questionnaires, for measuring systematic academic instruction. The questionnaires cover the Plan-Do-Check-Act cycle and academic versus behavioural instruction. The questionnaires are both practically oriented as well as theoretically well founded. The reliability turned out to be acceptable (0.76) to high (0.89). Observation scales were developed to determine the validity of both questionnaires. Moderate correlations between questionnaires and observation scales were found (0.31, 0.32). Bland–Altman plots offered us valuable information about the differences between questionnaires and observation scales, supplying us with important issues for further research. It is concluded that the questionnaires might be a valuable tool for assessing teachers' systematic academic instruction. DOI: 10.1111/1471-3802.12096",

keywords = "gedragsproblemen, academisch onderwijs, docenten, studenten, vragenlijsten, higher education, teaching, students, behavioural problems, questionnaires",

author = "\{van der Worp-van der Kamp\}, Lidy and S.J. Pijl and Post, \{Wendy J.\} and \{van den Bosch\}, Els and Jan Bijstra",

year = "2017",

month = jan,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1111/1471-3802.12096",

language = "English",

volume = "17",

pages = "31--40",

journal = "Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs",

issn = "1471-3802",

publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Systematic academic instruction for students with EBD

T2 - the construction and use of a tool for teachers

AU - van der Worp-van der Kamp, Lidy

AU - Pijl, S.J.

AU - Post, Wendy J.

AU - van den Bosch, Els

AU - Bijstra, Jan

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - Educating students with behavioural, emotional and social difficulties requires a thorough systematic approach with the focus on academic instruction. This study addresses the development of a tool, consisting of two questionnaires, for measuring systematic academic instruction. The questionnaires cover the Plan-Do-Check-Act cycle and academic versus behavioural instruction. The questionnaires are both practically oriented as well as theoretically well founded. The reliability turned out to be acceptable (0.76) to high (0.89). Observation scales were developed to determine the validity of both questionnaires. Moderate correlations between questionnaires and observation scales were found (0.31, 0.32). Bland–Altman plots offered us valuable information about the differences between questionnaires and observation scales, supplying us with important issues for further research. It is concluded that the questionnaires might be a valuable tool for assessing teachers' systematic academic instruction. DOI: 10.1111/1471-3802.12096

AB - Educating students with behavioural, emotional and social difficulties requires a thorough systematic approach with the focus on academic instruction. This study addresses the development of a tool, consisting of two questionnaires, for measuring systematic academic instruction. The questionnaires cover the Plan-Do-Check-Act cycle and academic versus behavioural instruction. The questionnaires are both practically oriented as well as theoretically well founded. The reliability turned out to be acceptable (0.76) to high (0.89). Observation scales were developed to determine the validity of both questionnaires. Moderate correlations between questionnaires and observation scales were found (0.31, 0.32). Bland–Altman plots offered us valuable information about the differences between questionnaires and observation scales, supplying us with important issues for further research. It is concluded that the questionnaires might be a valuable tool for assessing teachers' systematic academic instruction. DOI: 10.1111/1471-3802.12096

KW - gedragsproblemen

KW - academisch onderwijs

KW - docenten

KW - studenten

KW - vragenlijsten

KW - higher education

KW - teaching

KW - students

KW - behavioural problems

KW - questionnaires

U2 - 10.1111/1471-3802.12096

DO - 10.1111/1471-3802.12096

M3 - Article

SN - 1471-3802

VL - 17

SP - 31

EP - 40

JO - Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs

JF - Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs

IS - 1

ER -

Systematic academic instruction for students with EBD: the construction and use of a tool for teachers

Abstract

UN SDGs

Keywords

Research Focus Areas Hanze University of Applied Sciences * (mandatory by Hanze)

Research Focus Areas Research Centre or Centre of Expertise * (mandatory by Hanze)

Publinova themes

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this