Student distress in clinical workplace learning: differences in social comparison behaviours

A.N. Raat, Johanna Schönrock-Adema, E Ally van Hell, Jan B M Kuks, Janke Cohen-Schotanus

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

In medical education, student distress is known to hamper learning and professional development. To address this problem, recent studies aimed at helping students cope with stressful situations. Undergraduate students in clinical practice frequently use experiences of surrounding peers to estimate their abilities to master such challenging situations. This use of the experiences of others, known as social comparison, may affect student distress both positively and negatively. To find characteristics of a beneficial use of social comparison, we examined differences in comparison behaviours between students expressing low and high levels of distress. The participants in our study, response rate 93% (N = 301/321), were all medical students in their first year in clinical practice. They completed the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) to measure distress, and three separate questionnaires to measure: (1) orientation to comparison, (2) motive for comparison, and (3) interpretation of comparison. Differences were analysed using multivariate analysis of variance. Although all students were oriented towards social comparison, the analyses showed that this orientation was less apparent among low-distress students. Besides, the low-distress students were less inclined to use motives indicative for comparisons with peers perceived as performing worse and were less negative in the interpretations of their comparisons. As social comparison is frequently used among all students, we recommend to make them aware of their comparison behaviours and inform them about the pros and cons of the distinguished aspects of the comparison process.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)101-111
JournalAdvances in health sciences education: theory and practice
Volume20
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2015

Keywords

  • students
  • stress

Cite this

Raat, A.N. ; Schönrock-Adema, Johanna ; van Hell, E Ally ; Kuks, Jan B M ; Cohen-Schotanus, Janke. / Student distress in clinical workplace learning : differences in social comparison behaviours. In: Advances in health sciences education: theory and practice. 2015 ; Vol. 20, No. 1. pp. 101-111.
@article{88d56a49afe84d02a1a4a8e74fa401c9,
title = "Student distress in clinical workplace learning: differences in social comparison behaviours",
abstract = "In medical education, student distress is known to hamper learning and professional development. To address this problem, recent studies aimed at helping students cope with stressful situations. Undergraduate students in clinical practice frequently use experiences of surrounding peers to estimate their abilities to master such challenging situations. This use of the experiences of others, known as social comparison, may affect student distress both positively and negatively. To find characteristics of a beneficial use of social comparison, we examined differences in comparison behaviours between students expressing low and high levels of distress. The participants in our study, response rate 93{\%} (N = 301/321), were all medical students in their first year in clinical practice. They completed the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) to measure distress, and three separate questionnaires to measure: (1) orientation to comparison, (2) motive for comparison, and (3) interpretation of comparison. Differences were analysed using multivariate analysis of variance. Although all students were oriented towards social comparison, the analyses showed that this orientation was less apparent among low-distress students. Besides, the low-distress students were less inclined to use motives indicative for comparisons with peers perceived as performing worse and were less negative in the interpretations of their comparisons. As social comparison is frequently used among all students, we recommend to make them aware of their comparison behaviours and inform them about the pros and cons of the distinguished aspects of the comparison process.",
keywords = "students, stress, studenten, stress",
author = "A.N. Raat and Johanna Sch{\"o}nrock-Adema and {van Hell}, {E Ally} and Kuks, {Jan B M} and Janke Cohen-Schotanus",
year = "2015",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1007/s10459-014-9513-9",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
pages = "101--111",
journal = "Advances in health sciences education: theory and practice",
issn = "1382-4996",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "1",

}

Student distress in clinical workplace learning : differences in social comparison behaviours. / Raat, A.N.; Schönrock-Adema, Johanna; van Hell, E Ally; Kuks, Jan B M; Cohen-Schotanus, Janke.

In: Advances in health sciences education: theory and practice, Vol. 20, No. 1, 03.2015, p. 101-111.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Student distress in clinical workplace learning

T2 - differences in social comparison behaviours

AU - Raat, A.N.

AU - Schönrock-Adema, Johanna

AU - van Hell, E Ally

AU - Kuks, Jan B M

AU - Cohen-Schotanus, Janke

PY - 2015/3

Y1 - 2015/3

N2 - In medical education, student distress is known to hamper learning and professional development. To address this problem, recent studies aimed at helping students cope with stressful situations. Undergraduate students in clinical practice frequently use experiences of surrounding peers to estimate their abilities to master such challenging situations. This use of the experiences of others, known as social comparison, may affect student distress both positively and negatively. To find characteristics of a beneficial use of social comparison, we examined differences in comparison behaviours between students expressing low and high levels of distress. The participants in our study, response rate 93% (N = 301/321), were all medical students in their first year in clinical practice. They completed the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) to measure distress, and three separate questionnaires to measure: (1) orientation to comparison, (2) motive for comparison, and (3) interpretation of comparison. Differences were analysed using multivariate analysis of variance. Although all students were oriented towards social comparison, the analyses showed that this orientation was less apparent among low-distress students. Besides, the low-distress students were less inclined to use motives indicative for comparisons with peers perceived as performing worse and were less negative in the interpretations of their comparisons. As social comparison is frequently used among all students, we recommend to make them aware of their comparison behaviours and inform them about the pros and cons of the distinguished aspects of the comparison process.

AB - In medical education, student distress is known to hamper learning and professional development. To address this problem, recent studies aimed at helping students cope with stressful situations. Undergraduate students in clinical practice frequently use experiences of surrounding peers to estimate their abilities to master such challenging situations. This use of the experiences of others, known as social comparison, may affect student distress both positively and negatively. To find characteristics of a beneficial use of social comparison, we examined differences in comparison behaviours between students expressing low and high levels of distress. The participants in our study, response rate 93% (N = 301/321), were all medical students in their first year in clinical practice. They completed the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) to measure distress, and three separate questionnaires to measure: (1) orientation to comparison, (2) motive for comparison, and (3) interpretation of comparison. Differences were analysed using multivariate analysis of variance. Although all students were oriented towards social comparison, the analyses showed that this orientation was less apparent among low-distress students. Besides, the low-distress students were less inclined to use motives indicative for comparisons with peers perceived as performing worse and were less negative in the interpretations of their comparisons. As social comparison is frequently used among all students, we recommend to make them aware of their comparison behaviours and inform them about the pros and cons of the distinguished aspects of the comparison process.

KW - students

KW - stress

KW - studenten

KW - stress

U2 - 10.1007/s10459-014-9513-9

DO - 10.1007/s10459-014-9513-9

M3 - Article

VL - 20

SP - 101

EP - 111

JO - Advances in health sciences education: theory and practice

JF - Advances in health sciences education: theory and practice

SN - 1382-4996

IS - 1

ER -