Reliability and validity of a frailty assessment tool in specialized burn care, a retrospective multicentre cohort study

Keyphrases

• Multicenter Cohort Study 100%
• Burn Care 100%
• Clinical Frailty Scale 100%
• Frailty Assessment 100%
• Burn Injury 40%
• Dutch 30%
• Frailty 30%
• Inter-rater Reliability 30%
• Patient with Burns 30%
• Frailty Screening 30%
• Total Body Surface Area 20%
• Known-groups Validity 20%
• Safety Management System 20%
• Krippendorff 20%
• Aging 10%
• Logistic Regression Analysis 10%
• Electronic Patient File 10%
• Odds Ratio 10%
• Early Treatment 10%
• Comorbidity 10%
• Frail Elderly 10%
• Predictive Validity 10%
• High Mortality Rate 10%
• Adverse Outcomes 10%
• Elderly Patients 10%
• Assessment Instrument 10%
• Convergent Validity 10%
• Burn Center 10%
• In-hospital Mortality 10%
• Early Recognition 10%
• Area Burned 10%
• Inhalation Injury 10%
• Discharge Location 10%
• Screening Outcomes 10%
• Canadian Studies 10%
• Predictors of Adverse Outcomes 10%
• Home Discharge 10%

Nursing and Health Professions

• Cohort Analysis 100%
• Frailty 100%
• Thermal Burn 100%
• Interrater Reliability 15%
• Mortality Rate 10%
• Adverse Outcome 10%
• Surface Area 10%
• Odds Ratio 5%
• Elderly Patient 5%
• Logistic Regression Analysis 5%
• Injury 5%
• Predictive Validity 5%
• Convergent Validity 5%
• Hospital Mortality 5%
• Alka-Seltzer 5%
• Comorbidity 5%

Medicine and Dentistry

• Cohort Analysis 100%
• Frailty 100%
• Thermal Burn 100%
• Mortality Rate 10%
• Adverse Outcome 10%
• Body Surface 10%
• Logistic Regression Analysis 5%
• Injury 5%
• Elderly Patient 5%
• Hospital Mortality 5%
• Comorbidity 5%
• Odds Ratio 5%
• Exhalation 5%
• Acetylsalicylic Acid 5%