Quality criteria, instruments, and requirements for nursing documentation: a systematic review of systematic reviews

Kim De Groot, Mattanja Triemstra, Wolter Paans, Anneke L. Francke

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

AIM: To obtain an overview of existing evidence on quality criteria, instruments, and requirements for nursing documentation.

DESIGN: Systematic review of systematic reviews.

DATA SOURCES: We systematically searched the databases PubMed and CINAHL for the period 2007-April 2017. We also performed additional searches.

REVIEW METHODS: Two reviewers independently selected the reviews using a stepwise procedure, assessed the methodological quality of the selected reviews, and extracted the data using a predefined extraction format. We performed descriptive synthesis.

RESULTS: Eleven systematic reviews were included. Several quality criteria were described referring to the importance of following the nursing process and using standardized nursing terminologies. In addition, some evidence-based instruments were described for assessing the quality of nursing documentation, such as the D-Catch. Furthermore, several requirements for formats and systems of electronic nursing documentation were found that refer to the importance of user-friendliness and development in consultation with nursing staff.

CONCLUSION: Aligning documentation with the nursing process, using standard terminologies, and using user-friendly formats and systems appear to be important for high-quality nursing documentation. The lack of evidence-based quality indicators presents a challenge in the pursuit of high-quality nursing documentation.

IMPACT: There is uncertainty in nursing practice about which criteria have to be met to achieve high-quality documentation. Aligning documentation with the nursing process, using standard terminologies, and using user-friendly formats and systems appear to be important. These findings can help nursing staff and care organizations enhance the quality of nursing documentation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1379-1393
JournalJournal of advanced nursing
Volume75
Issue number7
Early online date3 Dec 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Keywords

  • documentation
  • nursing

Cite this

@article{97ffe4953adb4d79a697461026682f51,
title = "Quality criteria, instruments, and requirements for nursing documentation: a systematic review of systematic reviews",
abstract = "AIM: To obtain an overview of existing evidence on quality criteria, instruments, and requirements for nursing documentation.DESIGN: Systematic review of systematic reviews.DATA SOURCES: We systematically searched the databases PubMed and CINAHL for the period 2007-April 2017. We also performed additional searches.REVIEW METHODS: Two reviewers independently selected the reviews using a stepwise procedure, assessed the methodological quality of the selected reviews, and extracted the data using a predefined extraction format. We performed descriptive synthesis.RESULTS: Eleven systematic reviews were included. Several quality criteria were described referring to the importance of following the nursing process and using standardized nursing terminologies. In addition, some evidence-based instruments were described for assessing the quality of nursing documentation, such as the D-Catch. Furthermore, several requirements for formats and systems of electronic nursing documentation were found that refer to the importance of user-friendliness and development in consultation with nursing staff.CONCLUSION: Aligning documentation with the nursing process, using standard terminologies, and using user-friendly formats and systems appear to be important for high-quality nursing documentation. The lack of evidence-based quality indicators presents a challenge in the pursuit of high-quality nursing documentation.IMPACT: There is uncertainty in nursing practice about which criteria have to be met to achieve high-quality documentation. Aligning documentation with the nursing process, using standard terminologies, and using user-friendly formats and systems appear to be important. These findings can help nursing staff and care organizations enhance the quality of nursing documentation.",
keywords = "documentation, nursing, verpleegkunde, documentatie",
author = "{De Groot}, Kim and Mattanja Triemstra and Wolter Paans and Francke, {Anneke L.}",
note = "{\circledC} 2018 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.1111/jan.13919",
language = "English",
volume = "75",
pages = "1379--1393",
journal = "Journal of advanced nursing",
issn = "0309-2402",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "7",

}

Quality criteria, instruments, and requirements for nursing documentation : a systematic review of systematic reviews. / De Groot, Kim; Triemstra, Mattanja; Paans, Wolter; Francke, Anneke L.

In: Journal of advanced nursing, Vol. 75, No. 7, 2019, p. 1379-1393.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Quality criteria, instruments, and requirements for nursing documentation

T2 - a systematic review of systematic reviews

AU - De Groot, Kim

AU - Triemstra, Mattanja

AU - Paans, Wolter

AU - Francke, Anneke L.

N1 - © 2018 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - AIM: To obtain an overview of existing evidence on quality criteria, instruments, and requirements for nursing documentation.DESIGN: Systematic review of systematic reviews.DATA SOURCES: We systematically searched the databases PubMed and CINAHL for the period 2007-April 2017. We also performed additional searches.REVIEW METHODS: Two reviewers independently selected the reviews using a stepwise procedure, assessed the methodological quality of the selected reviews, and extracted the data using a predefined extraction format. We performed descriptive synthesis.RESULTS: Eleven systematic reviews were included. Several quality criteria were described referring to the importance of following the nursing process and using standardized nursing terminologies. In addition, some evidence-based instruments were described for assessing the quality of nursing documentation, such as the D-Catch. Furthermore, several requirements for formats and systems of electronic nursing documentation were found that refer to the importance of user-friendliness and development in consultation with nursing staff.CONCLUSION: Aligning documentation with the nursing process, using standard terminologies, and using user-friendly formats and systems appear to be important for high-quality nursing documentation. The lack of evidence-based quality indicators presents a challenge in the pursuit of high-quality nursing documentation.IMPACT: There is uncertainty in nursing practice about which criteria have to be met to achieve high-quality documentation. Aligning documentation with the nursing process, using standard terminologies, and using user-friendly formats and systems appear to be important. These findings can help nursing staff and care organizations enhance the quality of nursing documentation.

AB - AIM: To obtain an overview of existing evidence on quality criteria, instruments, and requirements for nursing documentation.DESIGN: Systematic review of systematic reviews.DATA SOURCES: We systematically searched the databases PubMed and CINAHL for the period 2007-April 2017. We also performed additional searches.REVIEW METHODS: Two reviewers independently selected the reviews using a stepwise procedure, assessed the methodological quality of the selected reviews, and extracted the data using a predefined extraction format. We performed descriptive synthesis.RESULTS: Eleven systematic reviews were included. Several quality criteria were described referring to the importance of following the nursing process and using standardized nursing terminologies. In addition, some evidence-based instruments were described for assessing the quality of nursing documentation, such as the D-Catch. Furthermore, several requirements for formats and systems of electronic nursing documentation were found that refer to the importance of user-friendliness and development in consultation with nursing staff.CONCLUSION: Aligning documentation with the nursing process, using standard terminologies, and using user-friendly formats and systems appear to be important for high-quality nursing documentation. The lack of evidence-based quality indicators presents a challenge in the pursuit of high-quality nursing documentation.IMPACT: There is uncertainty in nursing practice about which criteria have to be met to achieve high-quality documentation. Aligning documentation with the nursing process, using standard terminologies, and using user-friendly formats and systems appear to be important. These findings can help nursing staff and care organizations enhance the quality of nursing documentation.

KW - documentation

KW - nursing

KW - verpleegkunde

KW - documentatie

UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/quality-criteria-instruments-requirements-nursing-documentation-systematic-review-systematic-reviews

U2 - 10.1111/jan.13919

DO - 10.1111/jan.13919

M3 - Review article

VL - 75

SP - 1379

EP - 1393

JO - Journal of advanced nursing

JF - Journal of advanced nursing

SN - 0309-2402

IS - 7

ER -