Perspectives of Dutch health professionals regarding auditory processing disorders; a focus group study

Karin Neijenhuis, Ellen de Wit, Margreet Luinge

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study investigated the perspectives of professionals from the Dutch audiological centres on the definition and care pathways of children with suspected auditory processing disorders (susAPD).

DESIGN: focus group interviews.

STUDY SAMPLE: In total, 45 professionals from 6 disciplines, representing 22 different audiological centres and one ambulatory service, participated in five parallel focus group interviews. Participants had a variety of experience in diagnosing and advising children with suspected APD.

RESULTS: Qualitative analysis (open and thematic) identified four themes ("Definition", "Causes", "Diagnostic Procedures" and "Clinical Reasoning") expressing a variety of perspectives. Differences in perspectives were mainly affected by two debates: (1) whether or not APD exists as a pure (auditory) disorder and (2) whether or not current AP-tests are suitable in diagnosing children with listening difficulties. They also expressed a need for more guidance from the literature in their clinical decision making process.

CONCLUSIONS: Professionals from the Dutch audiological centres share a broad perspective on children with APD. The ICF framework supports this perspective, thereby diminishing the need for a clear definition. The use of AP-tests should be limited to children where broader developmental disorders are first ruled out; a possible "pure" APD could then be diagnosed in a limited number of children.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)942-950
JournalInternational journal of audiology
Volume56
Issue number12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2 Dec 2017

Keywords

  • auditory processing disorders
  • attention
  • audiologists
  • children
  • cognition
  • congresses (form)
  • hearing tests
  • netherlands
  • neuropsychological tests
  • psychology
  • risk factors
  • social workers
  • speech perception

Cite this

@article{b999bc77ed464646b4f01abb0bf4220d,
title = "Perspectives of Dutch health professionals regarding auditory processing disorders; a focus group study",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: This study investigated the perspectives of professionals from the Dutch audiological centres on the definition and care pathways of children with suspected auditory processing disorders (susAPD).DESIGN: focus group interviews.STUDY SAMPLE: In total, 45 professionals from 6 disciplines, representing 22 different audiological centres and one ambulatory service, participated in five parallel focus group interviews. Participants had a variety of experience in diagnosing and advising children with suspected APD.RESULTS: Qualitative analysis (open and thematic) identified four themes ({"}Definition{"}, {"}Causes{"}, {"}Diagnostic Procedures{"} and {"}Clinical Reasoning{"}) expressing a variety of perspectives. Differences in perspectives were mainly affected by two debates: (1) whether or not APD exists as a pure (auditory) disorder and (2) whether or not current AP-tests are suitable in diagnosing children with listening difficulties. They also expressed a need for more guidance from the literature in their clinical decision making process.CONCLUSIONS: Professionals from the Dutch audiological centres share a broad perspective on children with APD. The ICF framework supports this perspective, thereby diminishing the need for a clear definition. The use of AP-tests should be limited to children where broader developmental disorders are first ruled out; a possible {"}pure{"} APD could then be diagnosed in a limited number of children.",
keywords = "auditory processing disorders, attention, audiologists, children, cognition, congresses (form), hearing tests, netherlands, neuropsychological tests, psychology, risk factors, social workers, speech perception, gehoorstoornissen, kinderen",
author = "Karin Neijenhuis and {de Wit}, Ellen and Margreet Luinge",
year = "2017",
month = "12",
day = "2",
doi = "10.1080/14992027.2017.1347290",
language = "English",
volume = "56",
pages = "942--950",
journal = "International journal of audiology",
issn = "1499-2027",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "12",

}

Perspectives of Dutch health professionals regarding auditory processing disorders; a focus group study. / Neijenhuis, Karin; de Wit, Ellen; Luinge, Margreet.

In: International journal of audiology, Vol. 56, No. 12, 02.12.2017, p. 942-950.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Perspectives of Dutch health professionals regarding auditory processing disorders; a focus group study

AU - Neijenhuis, Karin

AU - de Wit, Ellen

AU - Luinge, Margreet

PY - 2017/12/2

Y1 - 2017/12/2

N2 - OBJECTIVE: This study investigated the perspectives of professionals from the Dutch audiological centres on the definition and care pathways of children with suspected auditory processing disorders (susAPD).DESIGN: focus group interviews.STUDY SAMPLE: In total, 45 professionals from 6 disciplines, representing 22 different audiological centres and one ambulatory service, participated in five parallel focus group interviews. Participants had a variety of experience in diagnosing and advising children with suspected APD.RESULTS: Qualitative analysis (open and thematic) identified four themes ("Definition", "Causes", "Diagnostic Procedures" and "Clinical Reasoning") expressing a variety of perspectives. Differences in perspectives were mainly affected by two debates: (1) whether or not APD exists as a pure (auditory) disorder and (2) whether or not current AP-tests are suitable in diagnosing children with listening difficulties. They also expressed a need for more guidance from the literature in their clinical decision making process.CONCLUSIONS: Professionals from the Dutch audiological centres share a broad perspective on children with APD. The ICF framework supports this perspective, thereby diminishing the need for a clear definition. The use of AP-tests should be limited to children where broader developmental disorders are first ruled out; a possible "pure" APD could then be diagnosed in a limited number of children.

AB - OBJECTIVE: This study investigated the perspectives of professionals from the Dutch audiological centres on the definition and care pathways of children with suspected auditory processing disorders (susAPD).DESIGN: focus group interviews.STUDY SAMPLE: In total, 45 professionals from 6 disciplines, representing 22 different audiological centres and one ambulatory service, participated in five parallel focus group interviews. Participants had a variety of experience in diagnosing and advising children with suspected APD.RESULTS: Qualitative analysis (open and thematic) identified four themes ("Definition", "Causes", "Diagnostic Procedures" and "Clinical Reasoning") expressing a variety of perspectives. Differences in perspectives were mainly affected by two debates: (1) whether or not APD exists as a pure (auditory) disorder and (2) whether or not current AP-tests are suitable in diagnosing children with listening difficulties. They also expressed a need for more guidance from the literature in their clinical decision making process.CONCLUSIONS: Professionals from the Dutch audiological centres share a broad perspective on children with APD. The ICF framework supports this perspective, thereby diminishing the need for a clear definition. The use of AP-tests should be limited to children where broader developmental disorders are first ruled out; a possible "pure" APD could then be diagnosed in a limited number of children.

KW - auditory processing disorders

KW - attention

KW - audiologists

KW - children

KW - cognition

KW - congresses (form)

KW - hearing tests

KW - netherlands

KW - neuropsychological tests

KW - psychology

KW - risk factors

KW - social workers

KW - speech perception

KW - gehoorstoornissen

KW - kinderen

UR - http://www.tandfonline.com/eprint/9JYaYyt5VSY4NnvdtGuj/full

U2 - 10.1080/14992027.2017.1347290

DO - 10.1080/14992027.2017.1347290

M3 - Article

VL - 56

SP - 942

EP - 950

JO - International journal of audiology

JF - International journal of audiology

SN - 1499-2027

IS - 12

ER -