Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Patient-reported scar quality in paediatric and adult burn patients: A long-term multicentre follow-up study

  • J Nicolaas Dijkshoorn
  • , Margriet E van Baar
  • , Anouk Pijpe
  • , Marianne Nieuwenhuis
  • , Harold Goei
  • , Cornelis H van der Vlies
  • , Inge Spronk
  • Maasstad Hospital - Burncentre Rotterdam
  • Association of Dutch Burn Centres, Burn Centre, Maasstad Hospital
  • Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Department of Public Health
  • Red Cross Hospital - Burncentre Beverwijk
  • Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit, Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery
  • Association of Dutch Burn Centres, Burn Centre, Red Cross Hospital
  • University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine
  • Association of Dutch Burn Centers
  • University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Center for Human Movement Sciences
  • Amsterdam UMC
  • Erasmus MC
  • Dutch Burns Foundation

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Background: Burn scar maturation can take several years but is generally studied shortly after injury. Therefore, we investigated patient-reported scar quality up to 5–7 years post-burn. Methods: Patients with ≤ 20 % total body surface area burned completed the Patient Scale of the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS 2.0) on the same scar at 3, > 18 months (median 28 months) and 5–7 years (median 63 months) post-burn. Results: Fifty-eight patients (21 children; 37 adults) with a median total body surface area burned (TBSA) of 6.3 % participated. Average patient-reported scar quality (POSAS score) was generally worst at 3 months (median score: 4.2), best at 28 months (median score: 2.2) and intermediate at 63 months post-burn (median score: 3.4) (p < 0.001). Many patients (66 %) reported a median 1.8 point higher (worse) POSAS score at 63 months compared to 28 months post-burn, whereas 14 % reported an identical, and 21 % a lower (better) score. At any assessment, largest differences with normal skin were reported for scar colour. Univariate predictive factors of long-term patient-reported scar quality were scar quality at 3 months (p = 0.002) and 28 months post-burn (p < 0.001), full-thickness burn size (p = 0.033), length of hospital stay (p = 0.003), and number of surgeries (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Two-thirds of patients with burns up to 20 % TBSA scored the quality of their scars worse at 63 months compared to 28 months post-burn. Whether this corresponds to increased dissatisfaction with scars in the long term should be further investigated. These new insights add to the body of knowledge on scar maturation and underscores the importance of discussing patients’ expectations.
Original languageEnglish
JournalBurns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries
Volume50
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 10 Jul 2024

Keywords

  • burn injuries
  • patient-reported outcome
  • scar quality

Research Focus Areas Hanze University of Applied Sciences * (mandatory by Hanze)

  • Healthy Ageing

Research Focus Areas Research Centre or Centre of Expertise * (mandatory by Hanze)

  • Frailty and adequate care

Publinova themes

  • Other
  • Health

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Patient-reported scar quality in paediatric and adult burn patients: A long-term multicentre follow-up study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this