Papillary fill response in single-tooth implants using abutments of different geometry

Ratnadeep Patil, Laurens den Hartog, Anjali Dilbaghi, Bart de Jong, Wouter Kerdijk, Marco S Cune

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    Abstract

    OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the influence of abutment geometry on papillary fill in the esthetic zone in a delayed crown protocol.

    MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-six subjects received two non-adjacent endosseous implants in the esthetic zone. Functional temporary crowns were installed 17-19 weeks later, using conventional (control) and curved (experimental) abutments. The abutments were randomized in each patient independently. Final crowns were cemented after 2 months (T0). Standard intraoral photographs and radiographs were made to evaluate papillary fill after 12 months (T12). The interproximal papilla fill was measured by means of the papilla index score (PIS) and related to the maximum bone level between the implant and the adjacent root as well as the peri-implant marginal bone level at T12, both measured radiographically.

    RESULTS: No statistically significant difference between the experimental and the control group could be demonstrated (P = 0.25). Ordinal regression analysis showed a positive correlation between the maximum bone level and papilla fill (P < 0.01) and a negative correlation between the peri-implant marginal bone level and papilla fill (P < 0.05).

    CONCLUSION: A concave abutment does not exhibit a better fill of the papilla compared with a straight abutment in single-tooth implant placement using a delayed protocol in the esthetic zone after 12 months of function.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1506-1510
    JournalClinical oral implants research
    Volume27
    Issue number12
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Dec 2016

    Keywords

    • dentistry
    • implants

    Cite this

    Patil, Ratnadeep ; den Hartog, Laurens ; Dilbaghi, Anjali ; de Jong, Bart ; Kerdijk, Wouter ; Cune, Marco S. / Papillary fill response in single-tooth implants using abutments of different geometry. In: Clinical oral implants research. 2016 ; Vol. 27, No. 12. pp. 1506-1510.
    @article{d508f9f9495f4b7a9cbd66141391dee6,
    title = "Papillary fill response in single-tooth implants using abutments of different geometry",
    abstract = "OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the influence of abutment geometry on papillary fill in the esthetic zone in a delayed crown protocol.MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-six subjects received two non-adjacent endosseous implants in the esthetic zone. Functional temporary crowns were installed 17-19 weeks later, using conventional (control) and curved (experimental) abutments. The abutments were randomized in each patient independently. Final crowns were cemented after 2 months (T0). Standard intraoral photographs and radiographs were made to evaluate papillary fill after 12 months (T12). The interproximal papilla fill was measured by means of the papilla index score (PIS) and related to the maximum bone level between the implant and the adjacent root as well as the peri-implant marginal bone level at T12, both measured radiographically.RESULTS: No statistically significant difference between the experimental and the control group could be demonstrated (P = 0.25). Ordinal regression analysis showed a positive correlation between the maximum bone level and papilla fill (P < 0.01) and a negative correlation between the peri-implant marginal bone level and papilla fill (P < 0.05).CONCLUSION: A concave abutment does not exhibit a better fill of the papilla compared with a straight abutment in single-tooth implant placement using a delayed protocol in the esthetic zone after 12 months of function.",
    keywords = "dentistry, implants, tandheelkunde, implantaten",
    author = "Ratnadeep Patil and {den Hartog}, Laurens and Anjali Dilbaghi and {de Jong}, Bart and Wouter Kerdijk and Cune, {Marco S}",
    note = "{\circledC} 2015 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.",
    year = "2016",
    month = "12",
    doi = "10.1111/clr.12594",
    language = "English",
    volume = "27",
    pages = "1506--1510",
    journal = "Clinical oral implants research",
    issn = "0905-7161",
    publisher = "Wiley",
    number = "12",

    }

    Papillary fill response in single-tooth implants using abutments of different geometry. / Patil, Ratnadeep; den Hartog, Laurens; Dilbaghi, Anjali; de Jong, Bart; Kerdijk, Wouter; Cune, Marco S.

    In: Clinical oral implants research, Vol. 27, No. 12, 12.2016, p. 1506-1510.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Papillary fill response in single-tooth implants using abutments of different geometry

    AU - Patil, Ratnadeep

    AU - den Hartog, Laurens

    AU - Dilbaghi, Anjali

    AU - de Jong, Bart

    AU - Kerdijk, Wouter

    AU - Cune, Marco S

    N1 - © 2015 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

    PY - 2016/12

    Y1 - 2016/12

    N2 - OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the influence of abutment geometry on papillary fill in the esthetic zone in a delayed crown protocol.MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-six subjects received two non-adjacent endosseous implants in the esthetic zone. Functional temporary crowns were installed 17-19 weeks later, using conventional (control) and curved (experimental) abutments. The abutments were randomized in each patient independently. Final crowns were cemented after 2 months (T0). Standard intraoral photographs and radiographs were made to evaluate papillary fill after 12 months (T12). The interproximal papilla fill was measured by means of the papilla index score (PIS) and related to the maximum bone level between the implant and the adjacent root as well as the peri-implant marginal bone level at T12, both measured radiographically.RESULTS: No statistically significant difference between the experimental and the control group could be demonstrated (P = 0.25). Ordinal regression analysis showed a positive correlation between the maximum bone level and papilla fill (P < 0.01) and a negative correlation between the peri-implant marginal bone level and papilla fill (P < 0.05).CONCLUSION: A concave abutment does not exhibit a better fill of the papilla compared with a straight abutment in single-tooth implant placement using a delayed protocol in the esthetic zone after 12 months of function.

    AB - OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the influence of abutment geometry on papillary fill in the esthetic zone in a delayed crown protocol.MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-six subjects received two non-adjacent endosseous implants in the esthetic zone. Functional temporary crowns were installed 17-19 weeks later, using conventional (control) and curved (experimental) abutments. The abutments were randomized in each patient independently. Final crowns were cemented after 2 months (T0). Standard intraoral photographs and radiographs were made to evaluate papillary fill after 12 months (T12). The interproximal papilla fill was measured by means of the papilla index score (PIS) and related to the maximum bone level between the implant and the adjacent root as well as the peri-implant marginal bone level at T12, both measured radiographically.RESULTS: No statistically significant difference between the experimental and the control group could be demonstrated (P = 0.25). Ordinal regression analysis showed a positive correlation between the maximum bone level and papilla fill (P < 0.01) and a negative correlation between the peri-implant marginal bone level and papilla fill (P < 0.05).CONCLUSION: A concave abutment does not exhibit a better fill of the papilla compared with a straight abutment in single-tooth implant placement using a delayed protocol in the esthetic zone after 12 months of function.

    KW - dentistry

    KW - implants

    KW - tandheelkunde

    KW - implantaten

    UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/papillary-fill-response-singletooth-implants-using-abutments-different-geometry

    U2 - 10.1111/clr.12594

    DO - 10.1111/clr.12594

    M3 - Article

    VL - 27

    SP - 1506

    EP - 1510

    JO - Clinical oral implants research

    JF - Clinical oral implants research

    SN - 0905-7161

    IS - 12

    ER -