TY - JOUR
T1 - Measuring self-regulation in a learning context
T2 - Reliability and validity of the Self-Regulation of Learning Self-Report Scale (SRL-SRS)
AU - Toering, Tynke
AU - Elferink-Gemser, Marije T.
AU - Jonker, Laura
AU - van Heuvelen, Marieke J.G.
AU - Visscher, Chris
PY - 2012/3/1
Y1 - 2012/3/1
N2 - Self-regulation of learning has been suggested to refer to self-directed processes that help individuals learn more effectively. No instrument is available to date examining self-regulation of learning as a relatively stable individual attribute. Therefore, based on Zimmerman's self-regulated learning theory, we composed the Self-Regulation of Learning Self-Report Scale (SRL-SRS), which comprises six subscales: planning, self-monitoring, evaluation, reflection, effort and self-efficacy. This study examined the reliability and validity of the SRL-SRS. Two confirmatory factor analyses were conducted involving 601 and 600 adolescents aged 11 to 17 years (M age = 13.9, SD = 1.3). The first confirmatory factor analysis revealed that an adjusted six-factor model described the observed data and content of factors best, which was cross-validated in the second sample of adolescents. The relative and absolute test-retest reliability was satisfactory. In conclusion, this study showed that the SRL-SRS is a reliable instrument, and supported its content and construct validity. © 2012 International Society of Sport Psychology.
AB - Self-regulation of learning has been suggested to refer to self-directed processes that help individuals learn more effectively. No instrument is available to date examining self-regulation of learning as a relatively stable individual attribute. Therefore, based on Zimmerman's self-regulated learning theory, we composed the Self-Regulation of Learning Self-Report Scale (SRL-SRS), which comprises six subscales: planning, self-monitoring, evaluation, reflection, effort and self-efficacy. This study examined the reliability and validity of the SRL-SRS. Two confirmatory factor analyses were conducted involving 601 and 600 adolescents aged 11 to 17 years (M age = 13.9, SD = 1.3). The first confirmatory factor analysis revealed that an adjusted six-factor model described the observed data and content of factors best, which was cross-validated in the second sample of adolescents. The relative and absolute test-retest reliability was satisfactory. In conclusion, this study showed that the SRL-SRS is a reliable instrument, and supported its content and construct validity. © 2012 International Society of Sport Psychology.
KW - leren
KW - jong volwassenen
KW - vragenlijsten
KW - bevestigende factor analyses
KW - betrouwbaarheid testresultaten
KW - self-regulation
KW - learning
KW - adolescent
KW - questionnaire
KW - confirmatory factor analysis
KW - internal consistency
KW - test-retest reliability
U2 - 10.1080/1612197x.2012.645132
DO - 10.1080/1612197x.2012.645132
M3 - Article
SN - 1612-197X
VL - 10
SP - 24
EP - 38
JO - International Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology
JF - International Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology
IS - 1
ER -