TY - JOUR
T1 - How prepared are we for cross-border outbreaks?
T2 - An exploratory analysis of cross-border response networks for outbreaks of multidrug resistant microorganisms in the Netherlands and Germany
AU - Maessen, Jacklien H J
AU - Raab, Jörg
AU - Haverkate, Manon
AU - Smollich, Martin
AU - Ter Waarbeek, Henriëtte L G
AU - Eilers, Renske
AU - Timen, Aura
PY - 2019
Y1 - 2019
N2 - BACKGROUND: The emergence and spread of multidrug resistant microorganisms is a serious threat to transnational public health. Therefore, it is vital that cross-border outbreak response systems are constantly prepared for fast, rigorous, and efficient response. This research aims to improve transnational collaboration by identifying, visualizing, and exploring two cross-border response networks that are likely to unfold during outbreaks involving the Netherlands and Germany.METHODS: Quantitative methods were used to explore response networks during a cross-border outbreak of carbapenem resistant Enterobacteriaceae in healthcare settings. Eighty-six Dutch and German health professionals reflected on a fictive but realistic outbreak scenario (response rate ≈ 70%). Data were collected regarding collaborative relationships between stakeholders during outbreak response, prior working relationships, and trust in the networks. Network analysis techniques were used to analyze the networks on the network level (density, centralization, clique structures, and similarity of tie constellations between two networks) and node level (brokerage measures and degree centrality).RESULTS: Although stakeholders mainly collaborate with stakeholders belonging to the same country, transnational collaboration is present in a centralized manner. Integration of the network is reached, since several actors are beneficially positioned to coordinate transnational collaboration. However, levels of trust are moderately low and prior-existing cross-border working relationships are sparse.CONCLUSION: Given the explored network characteristics, we conclude that the system has a promising basis to achieve effective coordination. However, future research has to determine what kind of network governance form might be most effective and efficient in coordinating the necessary cross-border response activity. Furthermore, networks identified in this study are not only crucial in times of outbreak containment, but should also be fostered in times of non-crisis.
AB - BACKGROUND: The emergence and spread of multidrug resistant microorganisms is a serious threat to transnational public health. Therefore, it is vital that cross-border outbreak response systems are constantly prepared for fast, rigorous, and efficient response. This research aims to improve transnational collaboration by identifying, visualizing, and exploring two cross-border response networks that are likely to unfold during outbreaks involving the Netherlands and Germany.METHODS: Quantitative methods were used to explore response networks during a cross-border outbreak of carbapenem resistant Enterobacteriaceae in healthcare settings. Eighty-six Dutch and German health professionals reflected on a fictive but realistic outbreak scenario (response rate ≈ 70%). Data were collected regarding collaborative relationships between stakeholders during outbreak response, prior working relationships, and trust in the networks. Network analysis techniques were used to analyze the networks on the network level (density, centralization, clique structures, and similarity of tie constellations between two networks) and node level (brokerage measures and degree centrality).RESULTS: Although stakeholders mainly collaborate with stakeholders belonging to the same country, transnational collaboration is present in a centralized manner. Integration of the network is reached, since several actors are beneficially positioned to coordinate transnational collaboration. However, levels of trust are moderately low and prior-existing cross-border working relationships are sparse.CONCLUSION: Given the explored network characteristics, we conclude that the system has a promising basis to achieve effective coordination. However, future research has to determine what kind of network governance form might be most effective and efficient in coordinating the necessary cross-border response activity. Furthermore, networks identified in this study are not only crucial in times of outbreak containment, but should also be fostered in times of non-crisis.
KW - carbapenem-resistant enterobacteriaceae
KW - contact tracing
KW - methods
KW - enterobacteriaceae infections
KW - epidemiology
KW - government programs
KW - organization
KW - administration
KW - pathogenicity
KW - Netherlands
KW - surveys
KW - questionnaires
KW - statistics & numerical data
KW - Germany
KW - humans
KW - international cooperation
KW - medical countermeasures
KW - disease outbreaks
KW - prevention & control
KW - carbapenem-resistente enterobacteriaceae
KW - pathogeniciteit
KW - contactopsporing
KW - methoden
KW - centrumobacteriaceae infecties
KW - epidemiologie
KW - overheidsprogramma's
KW - organisatie
KW - administratie
KW - medische tegenmaatregelen
KW - Nederland
KW - onderzoeken
KW - vragenlijsten
KW - statistieken en numerieke gegevens
KW - Duitsland
KW - internationale samenwerking
KW - pathogeniteit
KW - mensen
KW - ziekte-uitbraken
KW - preventie en controle
U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0219548
DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0219548
M3 - Article
C2 - 31291355
SN - 1932-6203
VL - 14
JO - PLoS ONE
JF - PLoS ONE
IS - 7
ER -