Abstract
Voor de interpretatie van de veelgebruikte Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) werd tot voor kort gebruik gemaakt van verouderde, Britse normen. Nieuwe, Nederlandse normen maken een betere, nauwkeuriger interpretatie van de scores mogelijk. Wat is er veranderd en waarom?
| Original language | Dutch |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 6-12 |
| Number of pages | 7 |
| Journal | Kind en Adolescent Praktijk |
| Volume | 21 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| Publication status | Published - 2022 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 03 Good Health and Well-being
Keywords
- psychosocial functioning
- strengths and difficulties questionnaire
- adolescence
- norms
- normative data
- cutt offs
- youth services
- child and adolescent psychiatry
-
Normative data for the self‑reported and parent‑reported Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) for ages 12–17
Vugteveen, J., de Bildt, A. & Timmerman, M. E., 1 Dec 2022, In: Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health. 16, 1, p. 5 13 p.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review
Open Access -
Validity Aspects of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) Adolescent Self-Report and Parent-Report Versions Among Dutch Adolescents
Vugteveen, J., de Bildt, A., Theunissen, M., Reijneveld, S. A. & Timmerman, M. E., 1 Mar 2021, In: Assessment. 28, 2, p. 601-616 16 p.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review
Open Access -
Measurement quality of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire for assessing psychosocial behaviour among Dutch adolescents
Vugteveen, J., 2020, University of Groningen.Research output: Ph.D. Thesis › PhD Research internal, graduation internal
Open Access
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver