Governing for resilience in vulnerable places

Elen-Maarja Trell (Editor), Britta Restemeyer (Editor), Melanie Bakema (Editor), Bettina van Hoven (Editor)

Research output: Book/ReportBook editingAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Floods can be approached at a given location with two different concepts in mind: defending against floods or adapting to floods (Saurí-Pujol et al., 2001) (further, the option of mitigation exists, but this is a rather long-term and large-scale approach). First, resistance-based flood protection is the traditional approach to flood risk; second is resilience, which is linked with the concept of flood risk management. Flood protection usually requires dykes, technical flood protection measures, and strong water management institutions with technical skills; resilient flood risk management asks for comprehensive and integrative concepts, encompassing many stakeholders and asking for collaboration at various levels. The advantage of resistance-oriented flood protection is that it facilitates using protected land efficiently without the necessity of making compromises because of the flood risk. However, this approach has boundaries and constraints when flood risk increases, protection measures fail, or extreme floods occur. Thus, complementary resilient flood risk management is necessary, which comes with costs for adaptation and compromises for land use, but allows for coping much better with the management of increasing risk and extreme events because it reduces vulnerabilities.
Original languageEnglish
Place of PublicationLondon
PublisherTaylor and Francis Ltd.
ISBN (Electronic)9781351596060
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Keywords

  • governance
  • resilience
  • vulnerable places

Cite this

Trell, E-M., Restemeyer, B., Bakema, M., & van Hoven, B. (Eds.) (2018). Governing for resilience in vulnerable places. London: Taylor and Francis Ltd. https://doi.org/https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/e/9781351596060
Trell, Elen-Maarja (Editor) ; Restemeyer, Britta (Editor) ; Bakema, Melanie (Editor) ; van Hoven, Bettina (Editor). / Governing for resilience in vulnerable places. London : Taylor and Francis Ltd., 2018.
@book{b766f7831b5a4c178332033265e1f8a8,
title = "Governing for resilience in vulnerable places",
abstract = "Floods can be approached at a given location with two different concepts in mind: defending against floods or adapting to floods (Saur{\'i}-Pujol et al., 2001) (further, the option of mitigation exists, but this is a rather long-term and large-scale approach). First, resistance-based flood protection is the traditional approach to flood risk; second is resilience, which is linked with the concept of flood risk management. Flood protection usually requires dykes, technical flood protection measures, and strong water management institutions with technical skills; resilient flood risk management asks for comprehensive and integrative concepts, encompassing many stakeholders and asking for collaboration at various levels. The advantage of resistance-oriented flood protection is that it facilitates using protected land efficiently without the necessity of making compromises because of the flood risk. However, this approach has boundaries and constraints when flood risk increases, protection measures fail, or extreme floods occur. Thus, complementary resilient flood risk management is necessary, which comes with costs for adaptation and compromises for land use, but allows for coping much better with the management of increasing risk and extreme events because it reduces vulnerabilities.",
keywords = "governance, resilience, vulnerable places, sociale wetenschappen, veerkracht",
editor = "Elen-Maarja Trell and Britta Restemeyer and Melanie Bakema and {van Hoven}, Bettina",
year = "2018",
doi = "https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/e/9781351596060",
language = "English",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
address = "United Kingdom",

}

Governing for resilience in vulnerable places. / Trell, Elen-Maarja (Editor); Restemeyer, Britta (Editor); Bakema, Melanie (Editor); van Hoven, Bettina (Editor).

London : Taylor and Francis Ltd., 2018.

Research output: Book/ReportBook editingAcademicpeer-review

TY - BOOK

T1 - Governing for resilience in vulnerable places

A2 - Trell, Elen-Maarja

A2 - Restemeyer, Britta

A2 - Bakema, Melanie

A2 - van Hoven, Bettina

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - Floods can be approached at a given location with two different concepts in mind: defending against floods or adapting to floods (Saurí-Pujol et al., 2001) (further, the option of mitigation exists, but this is a rather long-term and large-scale approach). First, resistance-based flood protection is the traditional approach to flood risk; second is resilience, which is linked with the concept of flood risk management. Flood protection usually requires dykes, technical flood protection measures, and strong water management institutions with technical skills; resilient flood risk management asks for comprehensive and integrative concepts, encompassing many stakeholders and asking for collaboration at various levels. The advantage of resistance-oriented flood protection is that it facilitates using protected land efficiently without the necessity of making compromises because of the flood risk. However, this approach has boundaries and constraints when flood risk increases, protection measures fail, or extreme floods occur. Thus, complementary resilient flood risk management is necessary, which comes with costs for adaptation and compromises for land use, but allows for coping much better with the management of increasing risk and extreme events because it reduces vulnerabilities.

AB - Floods can be approached at a given location with two different concepts in mind: defending against floods or adapting to floods (Saurí-Pujol et al., 2001) (further, the option of mitigation exists, but this is a rather long-term and large-scale approach). First, resistance-based flood protection is the traditional approach to flood risk; second is resilience, which is linked with the concept of flood risk management. Flood protection usually requires dykes, technical flood protection measures, and strong water management institutions with technical skills; resilient flood risk management asks for comprehensive and integrative concepts, encompassing many stakeholders and asking for collaboration at various levels. The advantage of resistance-oriented flood protection is that it facilitates using protected land efficiently without the necessity of making compromises because of the flood risk. However, this approach has boundaries and constraints when flood risk increases, protection measures fail, or extreme floods occur. Thus, complementary resilient flood risk management is necessary, which comes with costs for adaptation and compromises for land use, but allows for coping much better with the management of increasing risk and extreme events because it reduces vulnerabilities.

KW - governance

KW - resilience

KW - vulnerable places

KW - sociale wetenschappen

KW - veerkracht

U2 - https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/e/9781351596060

DO - https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/e/9781351596060

M3 - Book editing

BT - Governing for resilience in vulnerable places

PB - Taylor and Francis Ltd.

CY - London

ER -

Trell E-M, (ed.), Restemeyer B, (ed.), Bakema M, (ed.), van Hoven B, (ed.). Governing for resilience in vulnerable places. London: Taylor and Francis Ltd., 2018. https://doi.org/https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/e/9781351596060