Facility design consequences of different employees’ quality perceptions

Herman Kok, Mark P. Mobach, Onno Omta

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

An important challenge for facility management is to integrate the complex and comprehensive construct of different service processes and physical elements of the service facility into a meaningful and functional facility design. The difficulty of this task is clearly indicated by the present study that shows that different employee categories for interpersonal services have quite different perceptions of the facility design that stem from different but coherent needs and interests. Employees with management perspectives (i.e. top managers and facility managers) were significantly more positive about the facility design than frontline employees and their supervisors with providers’ perspectives. Also, providers attributed a more important role to facility design with respect to delivering interpersonal services than management did. We found strong indications for the need for cross-functional cooperation in decision making about the facility design, creating a more balanced setting and possibly empowering providers for the service encounter.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)152-178
JournalThe service industries journal
Volume35
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Keywords

  • employee perception
  • facility design
  • app analysis
  • facility management

Cite this

@article{cde587b62e294fb896a8b3770a21273d,
title = "Facility design consequences of different employees’ quality perceptions",
abstract = "An important challenge for facility management is to integrate the complex and comprehensive construct of different service processes and physical elements of the service facility into a meaningful and functional facility design. The difficulty of this task is clearly indicated by the present study that shows that different employee categories for interpersonal services have quite different perceptions of the facility design that stem from different but coherent needs and interests. Employees with management perspectives (i.e. top managers and facility managers) were significantly more positive about the facility design than frontline employees and their supervisors with providers’ perspectives. Also, providers attributed a more important role to facility design with respect to delivering interpersonal services than management did. We found strong indications for the need for cross-functional cooperation in decision making about the facility design, creating a more balanced setting and possibly empowering providers for the service encounter.",
keywords = "employee perception, facility design, app analysis, facility management, werknemersperceptie, faciliteitsontwero, ap analysis, facility management",
author = "Herman Kok and Mobach, {Mark P.} and Onno Omta",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1080/02642069.2014.990003",
language = "English",
volume = "35",
pages = "152--178",
journal = "The service industries journal",
issn = "0264-2069",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "3",

}

Facility design consequences of different employees’ quality perceptions. / Kok, Herman; Mobach, Mark P.; Omta, Onno.

In: The service industries journal, Vol. 35, No. 3, 2015, p. 152-178.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Facility design consequences of different employees’ quality perceptions

AU - Kok, Herman

AU - Mobach, Mark P.

AU - Omta, Onno

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - An important challenge for facility management is to integrate the complex and comprehensive construct of different service processes and physical elements of the service facility into a meaningful and functional facility design. The difficulty of this task is clearly indicated by the present study that shows that different employee categories for interpersonal services have quite different perceptions of the facility design that stem from different but coherent needs and interests. Employees with management perspectives (i.e. top managers and facility managers) were significantly more positive about the facility design than frontline employees and their supervisors with providers’ perspectives. Also, providers attributed a more important role to facility design with respect to delivering interpersonal services than management did. We found strong indications for the need for cross-functional cooperation in decision making about the facility design, creating a more balanced setting and possibly empowering providers for the service encounter.

AB - An important challenge for facility management is to integrate the complex and comprehensive construct of different service processes and physical elements of the service facility into a meaningful and functional facility design. The difficulty of this task is clearly indicated by the present study that shows that different employee categories for interpersonal services have quite different perceptions of the facility design that stem from different but coherent needs and interests. Employees with management perspectives (i.e. top managers and facility managers) were significantly more positive about the facility design than frontline employees and their supervisors with providers’ perspectives. Also, providers attributed a more important role to facility design with respect to delivering interpersonal services than management did. We found strong indications for the need for cross-functional cooperation in decision making about the facility design, creating a more balanced setting and possibly empowering providers for the service encounter.

KW - employee perception

KW - facility design

KW - app analysis

KW - facility management

KW - werknemersperceptie

KW - faciliteitsontwero

KW - ap analysis

KW - facility management

UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/facility-design-consequences-different-employees-quality-perceptions

U2 - 10.1080/02642069.2014.990003

DO - 10.1080/02642069.2014.990003

M3 - Article

VL - 35

SP - 152

EP - 178

JO - The service industries journal

JF - The service industries journal

SN - 0264-2069

IS - 3

ER -