TY - JOUR
T1 - EquiMoves: A Wireless Networked Inertial Measurement System for Objective Examination of Horse Gait
AU - Bosch, Stephan
AU - Bragança, Filipe Serra
AU - Marin-Perianu, Mihai
AU - Marin-Perianu, Raluca
AU - Zwaag, Berend Jan van der
AU - Voskamp, John
AU - Back, Willem
AU - Weeren, René van
AU - Havinga, Paul J. M.
PY - 2018/3/13
Y1 - 2018/3/13
N2 - In this paper, we describe and validate the EquiMoves system, which aims to support equine veterinarians in assessing lameness and gait performance in horses. The system works by capturing horse motion from up to eight synchronized wireless inertial measurement units. It can be used in various equine gait modes, and analyzes both upper-body and limb movements. The validation against an optical motion capture system is based on a Bland-Altman analysis that illustrates the agreement between the two systems. The sagittal kinematic results (protraction, retraction, and sagittal range of motion) show limits of agreement of ±2.3 degrees and an absolute bias of 0.3 degrees in the worst case. The coronal kinematic results (adduction, abduction, and coronal range of motion) show limits of agreement of -8.8 and 8.1 degrees, and an absolute bias of 0.4 degrees in the worst case. The worse coronal kinematic results are most likely caused by the optical system setup (depth perception difficulty and suboptimal marker placement). The upper-body symmetry results show no significant bias in the agreement between the two systems; in most cases, the agreement is within ±5 mm. On a trial-level basis, the limits of agreement for withers and sacrum are within ±2 mm, meaning that the system can properly quantify motion asymmetry. Overall, the bias for all symmetry-related results is less than 1 mm, which is important for reproducibility and further comparison to other systems.
AB - In this paper, we describe and validate the EquiMoves system, which aims to support equine veterinarians in assessing lameness and gait performance in horses. The system works by capturing horse motion from up to eight synchronized wireless inertial measurement units. It can be used in various equine gait modes, and analyzes both upper-body and limb movements. The validation against an optical motion capture system is based on a Bland-Altman analysis that illustrates the agreement between the two systems. The sagittal kinematic results (protraction, retraction, and sagittal range of motion) show limits of agreement of ±2.3 degrees and an absolute bias of 0.3 degrees in the worst case. The coronal kinematic results (adduction, abduction, and coronal range of motion) show limits of agreement of -8.8 and 8.1 degrees, and an absolute bias of 0.4 degrees in the worst case. The worse coronal kinematic results are most likely caused by the optical system setup (depth perception difficulty and suboptimal marker placement). The upper-body symmetry results show no significant bias in the agreement between the two systems; in most cases, the agreement is within ±5 mm. On a trial-level basis, the limits of agreement for withers and sacrum are within ±2 mm, meaning that the system can properly quantify motion asymmetry. Overall, the bias for all symmetry-related results is less than 1 mm, which is important for reproducibility and further comparison to other systems.
KW - IMU
KW - agreement analysis
KW - gait analysis
KW - horse
KW - lameness
KW - optical motion capture
KW - analyse van overeenkomsten
KW - kreupelheid
KW - loopanalyse
KW - optische bewegingsregistratie
KW - paard
U2 - 10.3390/s18030850
DO - 10.3390/s18030850
M3 - Article
C2 - 29534022
SN - 1424-3210
VL - 18
JO - Sensors
JF - Sensors
IS - 3
M1 - 850
ER -