Economics, scientific doubt and history

Frank Jan de Graaf

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleProfessional

10 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Subjects such as public finance, corporate finance, banking theory, risk management and management accounting are all largely based on the neoclassical approach. Most recent appointed professors have started their work with ideas based on a neoclassical fundament and its methodological preferences. Neoclassical economic thinking is not bad in itself. It has brought much good, even. However, now the downside of neoclassical theory has occurred. Failing financial markets have plunged the global economy into crisis. It is, therefore, high time for a debate on economic concepts as taught in universities and business schools. Are students really trained to think critically about economic theory and the consequences when economic theories are put into practice?
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)48-51
JournalGlobal focus
Volume4
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 12 Jan 2010

Keywords

  • economic crises
  • neoclassical school
  • public finance
  • economic models

Cite this

de Graaf, F. J. (2010). Economics, scientific doubt and history. Global focus, 4(1), 48-51.
de Graaf, Frank Jan. / Economics, scientific doubt and history. In: Global focus. 2010 ; Vol. 4, No. 1. pp. 48-51.
@article{4367e48d679a4112b8fa411ce98c6ac9,
title = "Economics, scientific doubt and history",
abstract = "Subjects such as public finance, corporate finance, banking theory, risk management and management accounting are all largely based on the neoclassical approach. Most recent appointed professors have started their work with ideas based on a neoclassical fundament and its methodological preferences. Neoclassical economic thinking is not bad in itself. It has brought much good, even. However, now the downside of neoclassical theory has occurred. Failing financial markets have plunged the global economy into crisis. It is, therefore, high time for a debate on economic concepts as taught in universities and business schools. Are students really trained to think critically about economic theory and the consequences when economic theories are put into practice?",
keywords = "economische crises, neoklassieke school, openbare financi{\"e}n, economische modellen, economic crises, neoclassical school, public finance, economic models",
author = "{de Graaf}, {Frank Jan}",
year = "2010",
month = "1",
day = "12",
language = "English",
volume = "4",
pages = "48--51",
journal = "Global focus",
issn = "1381-7191",
publisher = "European Foundation for Management Development (EFMD)",
number = "1",

}

de Graaf, FJ 2010, 'Economics, scientific doubt and history' Global focus, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 48-51.

Economics, scientific doubt and history. / de Graaf, Frank Jan.

In: Global focus, Vol. 4, No. 1, 12.01.2010, p. 48-51.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleProfessional

TY - JOUR

T1 - Economics, scientific doubt and history

AU - de Graaf, Frank Jan

PY - 2010/1/12

Y1 - 2010/1/12

N2 - Subjects such as public finance, corporate finance, banking theory, risk management and management accounting are all largely based on the neoclassical approach. Most recent appointed professors have started their work with ideas based on a neoclassical fundament and its methodological preferences. Neoclassical economic thinking is not bad in itself. It has brought much good, even. However, now the downside of neoclassical theory has occurred. Failing financial markets have plunged the global economy into crisis. It is, therefore, high time for a debate on economic concepts as taught in universities and business schools. Are students really trained to think critically about economic theory and the consequences when economic theories are put into practice?

AB - Subjects such as public finance, corporate finance, banking theory, risk management and management accounting are all largely based on the neoclassical approach. Most recent appointed professors have started their work with ideas based on a neoclassical fundament and its methodological preferences. Neoclassical economic thinking is not bad in itself. It has brought much good, even. However, now the downside of neoclassical theory has occurred. Failing financial markets have plunged the global economy into crisis. It is, therefore, high time for a debate on economic concepts as taught in universities and business schools. Are students really trained to think critically about economic theory and the consequences when economic theories are put into practice?

KW - economische crises

KW - neoklassieke school

KW - openbare financiën

KW - economische modellen

KW - economic crises

KW - neoclassical school

KW - public finance

KW - economic models

M3 - Article

VL - 4

SP - 48

EP - 51

JO - Global focus

JF - Global focus

SN - 1381-7191

IS - 1

ER -

de Graaf FJ. Economics, scientific doubt and history. Global focus. 2010 Jan 12;4(1):48-51.