Dutch Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA): training improves scores for comprehensibility and difficulty

Martine Sealy, Faith D. Ottery, Jan Roodenburg, Anne van der Braak, Danique Haven, Cees van der Schans, Harriët Jager

Research output: Contribution to conferencePosterAcademic

23 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Rationale: The Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA) is a validated instrument to assess and monitor malnutrition, which consists of both patient-reported and professional-reported items. A professional should be able to correctly interpret all items. Untrained professionals may experience difficulty in completing some items of the PG-SGA. We aimed to explore the change in perceived comprehensibility and difficulty of the Dutch PG-SGA by health care professionals on the use of the instrument, before and after training.
Methods: A sample of 36 untrained health care professionals, of which 34 dietitians, completed a set of 29 items on a four point scale regarding comprehensibility and difficulty of the PG-SGA on two separate occasions:
T0) two weeks before and T1) directly after an instructional session on the PG-SGA and training with the physical exam. Summarized comprehensibility indexes (SCI) and difficulty indexes (SDI) were calculated for the patient part of the PG-SGA (aka PG-SGA Short Form; PG-SGA SF), the professional part of the PG-SGA (PG-SGApro) and the full PG-SGA, to quantify the level of perceived comprehensibility and difficulty. SCI≥0.80 and SDI≥0.80 were considered acceptable, SCI≥0.90 and SDI≥0.90 were considered excellent.
Results: SCI of the PG-SGA SF was acceptable both before (SCI: 0.80) and after training (SCI: 0.89). SCI of the PG-SGApro and full PG-SGA changed from unacceptable (SCI: 0.64; 0.69) to excellent (SCI: 0.95; 0.94).
All SDIs changed from unacceptable (SDI for respectively PG-SGA SF, PG-SGApro and full PG-SGA: 0.71; 0.50; 0.57) to acceptable (SDI: 0.88; 0.85; 0.87).
Conclusion: Training professionals in the use of the PG-SGA can be an effective strategy for improving the level of both comprehensibility and difficulty.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages1
Publication statusPublished - 2015
Event37th ESPEN Congress on Clinical Nutrition & Metabolism 2015: Healthy Life Through Nutrition - International Congress Centre of Lisbon (CCL) , Lisbon, Portugal
Duration: 5 Sep 20158 Sep 2015
Conference number: 37th
http://www.espen.org/lisbon

Conference

Conference37th ESPEN Congress on Clinical Nutrition & Metabolism 2015
Abbreviated titleESPEN 2015
CountryPortugal
CityLisbon
Period5/09/158/09/15
Internet address

Keywords

  • hospital patients
  • malnutrition
  • monitoring
  • health care
  • dietitians
  • nutritional assessment

Cite this

Sealy, M., Ottery, F. D., Roodenburg, J., van der Braak, A., Haven, D., van der Schans, C., & Jager, H. (2015). Dutch Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA): training improves scores for comprehensibility and difficulty. Poster session presented at 37th ESPEN Congress on Clinical Nutrition & Metabolism 2015, Lisbon, Portugal.
Sealy, Martine ; Ottery, Faith D. ; Roodenburg, Jan ; van der Braak, Anne ; Haven, Danique ; van der Schans, Cees ; Jager, Harriët. / Dutch Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA): training improves scores for comprehensibility and difficulty. Poster session presented at 37th ESPEN Congress on Clinical Nutrition & Metabolism 2015, Lisbon, Portugal.1 p.
@conference{da4419bdd7bb48d0a957f638d61e91d2,
title = "Dutch Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA): training improves scores for comprehensibility and difficulty",
abstract = "Rationale: The Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA) is a validated instrument to assess and monitor malnutrition, which consists of both patient-reported and professional-reported items. A professional should be able to correctly interpret all items. Untrained professionals may experience difficulty in completing some items of the PG-SGA. We aimed to explore the change in perceived comprehensibility and difficulty of the Dutch PG-SGA by health care professionals on the use of the instrument, before and after training.Methods: A sample of 36 untrained health care professionals, of which 34 dietitians, completed a set of 29 items on a four point scale regarding comprehensibility and difficulty of the PG-SGA on two separate occasions: T0) two weeks before and T1) directly after an instructional session on the PG-SGA and training with the physical exam. Summarized comprehensibility indexes (SCI) and difficulty indexes (SDI) were calculated for the patient part of the PG-SGA (aka PG-SGA Short Form; PG-SGA SF), the professional part of the PG-SGA (PG-SGApro) and the full PG-SGA, to quantify the level of perceived comprehensibility and difficulty. SCI≥0.80 and SDI≥0.80 were considered acceptable, SCI≥0.90 and SDI≥0.90 were considered excellent.Results: SCI of the PG-SGA SF was acceptable both before (SCI: 0.80) and after training (SCI: 0.89). SCI of the PG-SGApro and full PG-SGA changed from unacceptable (SCI: 0.64; 0.69) to excellent (SCI: 0.95; 0.94). All SDIs changed from unacceptable (SDI for respectively PG-SGA SF, PG-SGApro and full PG-SGA: 0.71; 0.50; 0.57) to acceptable (SDI: 0.88; 0.85; 0.87).Conclusion: Training professionals in the use of the PG-SGA can be an effective strategy for improving the level of both comprehensibility and difficulty.",
keywords = "hospital patients, malnutrition, monitoring, health care, dietitians, nutritional assessment, ziekenhuispati{\"e}nten, ondervoeding, gezondheidszorg, di{\"e}tisten, voedingsbeoordeling, monitoring",
author = "Martine Sealy and Ottery, {Faith D.} and Jan Roodenburg and {van der Braak}, Anne and Danique Haven and {van der Schans}, Cees and Harri{\"e}t Jager",
year = "2015",
language = "English",
note = "37th ESPEN Congress on Clinical Nutrition & Metabolism 2015 : Healthy Life Through Nutrition, ESPEN 2015 ; Conference date: 05-09-2015 Through 08-09-2015",
url = "http://www.espen.org/lisbon",

}

Sealy, M, Ottery, FD, Roodenburg, J, van der Braak, A, Haven, D, van der Schans, C & Jager, H 2015, 'Dutch Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA): training improves scores for comprehensibility and difficulty' 37th ESPEN Congress on Clinical Nutrition & Metabolism 2015, Lisbon, Portugal, 5/09/15 - 8/09/15, .

Dutch Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA): training improves scores for comprehensibility and difficulty. / Sealy, Martine; Ottery, Faith D.; Roodenburg, Jan; van der Braak, Anne; Haven, Danique; van der Schans, Cees; Jager, Harriët.

2015. Poster session presented at 37th ESPEN Congress on Clinical Nutrition & Metabolism 2015, Lisbon, Portugal.

Research output: Contribution to conferencePosterAcademic

TY - CONF

T1 - Dutch Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA): training improves scores for comprehensibility and difficulty

AU - Sealy, Martine

AU - Ottery, Faith D.

AU - Roodenburg, Jan

AU - van der Braak, Anne

AU - Haven, Danique

AU - van der Schans, Cees

AU - Jager, Harriët

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Rationale: The Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA) is a validated instrument to assess and monitor malnutrition, which consists of both patient-reported and professional-reported items. A professional should be able to correctly interpret all items. Untrained professionals may experience difficulty in completing some items of the PG-SGA. We aimed to explore the change in perceived comprehensibility and difficulty of the Dutch PG-SGA by health care professionals on the use of the instrument, before and after training.Methods: A sample of 36 untrained health care professionals, of which 34 dietitians, completed a set of 29 items on a four point scale regarding comprehensibility and difficulty of the PG-SGA on two separate occasions: T0) two weeks before and T1) directly after an instructional session on the PG-SGA and training with the physical exam. Summarized comprehensibility indexes (SCI) and difficulty indexes (SDI) were calculated for the patient part of the PG-SGA (aka PG-SGA Short Form; PG-SGA SF), the professional part of the PG-SGA (PG-SGApro) and the full PG-SGA, to quantify the level of perceived comprehensibility and difficulty. SCI≥0.80 and SDI≥0.80 were considered acceptable, SCI≥0.90 and SDI≥0.90 were considered excellent.Results: SCI of the PG-SGA SF was acceptable both before (SCI: 0.80) and after training (SCI: 0.89). SCI of the PG-SGApro and full PG-SGA changed from unacceptable (SCI: 0.64; 0.69) to excellent (SCI: 0.95; 0.94). All SDIs changed from unacceptable (SDI for respectively PG-SGA SF, PG-SGApro and full PG-SGA: 0.71; 0.50; 0.57) to acceptable (SDI: 0.88; 0.85; 0.87).Conclusion: Training professionals in the use of the PG-SGA can be an effective strategy for improving the level of both comprehensibility and difficulty.

AB - Rationale: The Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA) is a validated instrument to assess and monitor malnutrition, which consists of both patient-reported and professional-reported items. A professional should be able to correctly interpret all items. Untrained professionals may experience difficulty in completing some items of the PG-SGA. We aimed to explore the change in perceived comprehensibility and difficulty of the Dutch PG-SGA by health care professionals on the use of the instrument, before and after training.Methods: A sample of 36 untrained health care professionals, of which 34 dietitians, completed a set of 29 items on a four point scale regarding comprehensibility and difficulty of the PG-SGA on two separate occasions: T0) two weeks before and T1) directly after an instructional session on the PG-SGA and training with the physical exam. Summarized comprehensibility indexes (SCI) and difficulty indexes (SDI) were calculated for the patient part of the PG-SGA (aka PG-SGA Short Form; PG-SGA SF), the professional part of the PG-SGA (PG-SGApro) and the full PG-SGA, to quantify the level of perceived comprehensibility and difficulty. SCI≥0.80 and SDI≥0.80 were considered acceptable, SCI≥0.90 and SDI≥0.90 were considered excellent.Results: SCI of the PG-SGA SF was acceptable both before (SCI: 0.80) and after training (SCI: 0.89). SCI of the PG-SGApro and full PG-SGA changed from unacceptable (SCI: 0.64; 0.69) to excellent (SCI: 0.95; 0.94). All SDIs changed from unacceptable (SDI for respectively PG-SGA SF, PG-SGApro and full PG-SGA: 0.71; 0.50; 0.57) to acceptable (SDI: 0.88; 0.85; 0.87).Conclusion: Training professionals in the use of the PG-SGA can be an effective strategy for improving the level of both comprehensibility and difficulty.

KW - hospital patients

KW - malnutrition

KW - monitoring

KW - health care

KW - dietitians

KW - nutritional assessment

KW - ziekenhuispatiënten

KW - ondervoeding

KW - gezondheidszorg

KW - diëtisten

KW - voedingsbeoordeling

KW - monitoring

M3 - Poster

ER -

Sealy M, Ottery FD, Roodenburg J, van der Braak A, Haven D, van der Schans C et al. Dutch Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA): training improves scores for comprehensibility and difficulty. 2015. Poster session presented at 37th ESPEN Congress on Clinical Nutrition & Metabolism 2015, Lisbon, Portugal.