Development of cognitive processing and judgments of knowledge in medical students: analysis of progress test results

Dario Cecilio-Fernandes, Wouter Kerdijk, A D Debbie C Jaarsma, René A Tio

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Beside acquiring knowledge, medical students should also develop the ability to apply and reflect on it, requiring higher-order cognitive processing. Ideally, students should have reached higher-order cognitive processing when they enter the clinical program. Whether this is the case, is unknown. We investigated students' cognitive processing, and awareness of their knowledge during medical school.

METHODS: Data were gathered from 347 first-year preclinical and 196 first-year clinical students concerning the 2008 and 2011 Dutch progress tests. Questions were classified based upon Bloom's taxonomy: "simple questions" requiring lower and "vignette questions" requiring higher-order cognitive processing. Subsequently, we compared students' performance and awareness of their knowledge in 2008 to that in 2011 for each question type.

RESULTS: Students' performance on each type of question increased as students progressed. Preclinical and first-year clinical students performed better on simple questions than on vignette questions. Third-year clinical students performed better on vignette questions than on simple questions. The accuracy of students' judgment of knowledge decreased over time.

CONCLUSIONS: The progress test is a useful tool to assess students' cognitive processing and awareness of their knowledge. At the end of medical school, students achieved higher-order cognitive processing but their awareness of their knowledge had decreased.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1125-1129
JournalMedical teacher
Volume38
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2016
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • medical education
  • students
  • cognition

Cite this

Cecilio-Fernandes, Dario ; Kerdijk, Wouter ; Jaarsma, A D Debbie C ; Tio, René A. / Development of cognitive processing and judgments of knowledge in medical students: analysis of progress test results. In: Medical teacher. 2016 ; Vol. 38, No. 11. pp. 1125-1129.
@article{2660789684854ef0b9dd3a9d96c0d2b9,
title = "Development of cognitive processing and judgments of knowledge in medical students: analysis of progress test results",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Beside acquiring knowledge, medical students should also develop the ability to apply and reflect on it, requiring higher-order cognitive processing. Ideally, students should have reached higher-order cognitive processing when they enter the clinical program. Whether this is the case, is unknown. We investigated students' cognitive processing, and awareness of their knowledge during medical school.METHODS: Data were gathered from 347 first-year preclinical and 196 first-year clinical students concerning the 2008 and 2011 Dutch progress tests. Questions were classified based upon Bloom's taxonomy: {"}simple questions{"} requiring lower and {"}vignette questions{"} requiring higher-order cognitive processing. Subsequently, we compared students' performance and awareness of their knowledge in 2008 to that in 2011 for each question type.RESULTS: Students' performance on each type of question increased as students progressed. Preclinical and first-year clinical students performed better on simple questions than on vignette questions. Third-year clinical students performed better on vignette questions than on simple questions. The accuracy of students' judgment of knowledge decreased over time.CONCLUSIONS: The progress test is a useful tool to assess students' cognitive processing and awareness of their knowledge. At the end of medical school, students achieved higher-order cognitive processing but their awareness of their knowledge had decreased.",
keywords = "medical education, students, cognition, medisch onderwijs, studenten, cognitie",
author = "Dario Cecilio-Fernandes and Wouter Kerdijk and Jaarsma, {A D Debbie C} and Tio, {Ren{\'e} A}",
year = "2016",
month = "11",
doi = "10.3109/0142159X.2016.1170781",
language = "English",
volume = "38",
pages = "1125--1129",
journal = "Medical teacher",
issn = "0142-159X",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "11",

}

Development of cognitive processing and judgments of knowledge in medical students: analysis of progress test results. / Cecilio-Fernandes, Dario; Kerdijk, Wouter; Jaarsma, A D Debbie C; Tio, René A.

In: Medical teacher, Vol. 38, No. 11, 11.2016, p. 1125-1129.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Development of cognitive processing and judgments of knowledge in medical students: analysis of progress test results

AU - Cecilio-Fernandes, Dario

AU - Kerdijk, Wouter

AU - Jaarsma, A D Debbie C

AU - Tio, René A

PY - 2016/11

Y1 - 2016/11

N2 - BACKGROUND: Beside acquiring knowledge, medical students should also develop the ability to apply and reflect on it, requiring higher-order cognitive processing. Ideally, students should have reached higher-order cognitive processing when they enter the clinical program. Whether this is the case, is unknown. We investigated students' cognitive processing, and awareness of their knowledge during medical school.METHODS: Data were gathered from 347 first-year preclinical and 196 first-year clinical students concerning the 2008 and 2011 Dutch progress tests. Questions were classified based upon Bloom's taxonomy: "simple questions" requiring lower and "vignette questions" requiring higher-order cognitive processing. Subsequently, we compared students' performance and awareness of their knowledge in 2008 to that in 2011 for each question type.RESULTS: Students' performance on each type of question increased as students progressed. Preclinical and first-year clinical students performed better on simple questions than on vignette questions. Third-year clinical students performed better on vignette questions than on simple questions. The accuracy of students' judgment of knowledge decreased over time.CONCLUSIONS: The progress test is a useful tool to assess students' cognitive processing and awareness of their knowledge. At the end of medical school, students achieved higher-order cognitive processing but their awareness of their knowledge had decreased.

AB - BACKGROUND: Beside acquiring knowledge, medical students should also develop the ability to apply and reflect on it, requiring higher-order cognitive processing. Ideally, students should have reached higher-order cognitive processing when they enter the clinical program. Whether this is the case, is unknown. We investigated students' cognitive processing, and awareness of their knowledge during medical school.METHODS: Data were gathered from 347 first-year preclinical and 196 first-year clinical students concerning the 2008 and 2011 Dutch progress tests. Questions were classified based upon Bloom's taxonomy: "simple questions" requiring lower and "vignette questions" requiring higher-order cognitive processing. Subsequently, we compared students' performance and awareness of their knowledge in 2008 to that in 2011 for each question type.RESULTS: Students' performance on each type of question increased as students progressed. Preclinical and first-year clinical students performed better on simple questions than on vignette questions. Third-year clinical students performed better on vignette questions than on simple questions. The accuracy of students' judgment of knowledge decreased over time.CONCLUSIONS: The progress test is a useful tool to assess students' cognitive processing and awareness of their knowledge. At the end of medical school, students achieved higher-order cognitive processing but their awareness of their knowledge had decreased.

KW - medical education

KW - students

KW - cognition

KW - medisch onderwijs

KW - studenten

KW - cognitie

UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/development-cognitive-processing-judgments-knowledge-medical-students-analysis-progress-test-results

U2 - 10.3109/0142159X.2016.1170781

DO - 10.3109/0142159X.2016.1170781

M3 - Article

VL - 38

SP - 1125

EP - 1129

JO - Medical teacher

JF - Medical teacher

SN - 0142-159X

IS - 11

ER -