Design for Disruption: Creating Anti-fragile Urban Delta Landscapes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademic

Abstract

In this article three different responses are taken as the starting point how different types of disruption could be dealt with. These responses—repair, bounce back and grow stronger—are combined with three disruptions (sea level rise, storm surge and heavy rainfall), and then tested in three case studies. The result of the investigation is that anti-fragility (grow stronger) is a preferential approach to create delta landscapes that become stronger under influence of a disruption. Anti-fragility is for this research subdivided in three main characteristics, abundance of networks, adaptivity and counterintuitivity, which are used to analyse the three case study propositions. The type of response, type of disruption, characteristic of anti-fragility and the qualities of the case study area itself determine the design proposition and the outcome. In all cases this approach has led to a stronger and safer landscape. The concept of anti-fragility impacts on the period before a disruption, during and also after the disruptive impact. This gives it a better point of departure in dealing with uncertain or unprecedented hazards and disruptions.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)113-122
Number of pages10
JournalUrban planning
Volume4
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Fingerprint

storm surge
hazard
rainfall
sea level rise

Keywords

  • delta landscape
  • anti-fragility
  • disruption
  • intervention
  • coast
  • resilience

Cite this

@article{0f9e2cc297fb412487e8251dc9b3eecb,
title = "Design for Disruption: Creating Anti-fragile Urban Delta Landscapes",
abstract = "In this article three different responses are taken as the starting point how different types of disruption could be dealt with. These responses—repair, bounce back and grow stronger—are combined with three disruptions (sea level rise, storm surge and heavy rainfall), and then tested in three case studies. The result of the investigation is that anti-fragility (grow stronger) is a preferential approach to create delta landscapes that become stronger under influence of a disruption. Anti-fragility is for this research subdivided in three main characteristics, abundance of networks, adaptivity and counterintuitivity, which are used to analyse the three case study propositions. The type of response, type of disruption, characteristic of anti-fragility and the qualities of the case study area itself determine the design proposition and the outcome. In all cases this approach has led to a stronger and safer landscape. The concept of anti-fragility impacts on the period before a disruption, during and also after the disruptive impact. This gives it a better point of departure in dealing with uncertain or unprecedented hazards and disruptions.",
keywords = "delta landscape, anti-fragility, disruption, intervention, coast, resilience",
author = "Rob Roggema",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.17645/up.v4i1.1469",
language = "English",
volume = "4",
pages = "113--122",
journal = "Urban planning",
issn = "2183-7635",
publisher = "Cogitatio Press",
number = "1",

}

Design for Disruption: Creating Anti-fragile Urban Delta Landscapes. / Roggema, Rob.

In: Urban planning, Vol. 4, No. 1, 2019, p. 113-122.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademic

TY - JOUR

T1 - Design for Disruption: Creating Anti-fragile Urban Delta Landscapes

AU - Roggema, Rob

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - In this article three different responses are taken as the starting point how different types of disruption could be dealt with. These responses—repair, bounce back and grow stronger—are combined with three disruptions (sea level rise, storm surge and heavy rainfall), and then tested in three case studies. The result of the investigation is that anti-fragility (grow stronger) is a preferential approach to create delta landscapes that become stronger under influence of a disruption. Anti-fragility is for this research subdivided in three main characteristics, abundance of networks, adaptivity and counterintuitivity, which are used to analyse the three case study propositions. The type of response, type of disruption, characteristic of anti-fragility and the qualities of the case study area itself determine the design proposition and the outcome. In all cases this approach has led to a stronger and safer landscape. The concept of anti-fragility impacts on the period before a disruption, during and also after the disruptive impact. This gives it a better point of departure in dealing with uncertain or unprecedented hazards and disruptions.

AB - In this article three different responses are taken as the starting point how different types of disruption could be dealt with. These responses—repair, bounce back and grow stronger—are combined with three disruptions (sea level rise, storm surge and heavy rainfall), and then tested in three case studies. The result of the investigation is that anti-fragility (grow stronger) is a preferential approach to create delta landscapes that become stronger under influence of a disruption. Anti-fragility is for this research subdivided in three main characteristics, abundance of networks, adaptivity and counterintuitivity, which are used to analyse the three case study propositions. The type of response, type of disruption, characteristic of anti-fragility and the qualities of the case study area itself determine the design proposition and the outcome. In all cases this approach has led to a stronger and safer landscape. The concept of anti-fragility impacts on the period before a disruption, during and also after the disruptive impact. This gives it a better point of departure in dealing with uncertain or unprecedented hazards and disruptions.

KW - delta landscape

KW - anti-fragility

KW - disruption

KW - intervention

KW - coast

KW - resilience

UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/design-disruption-creating-antifragile-urban-delta-landscapes

U2 - 10.17645/up.v4i1.1469

DO - 10.17645/up.v4i1.1469

M3 - Article

VL - 4

SP - 113

EP - 122

JO - Urban planning

JF - Urban planning

SN - 2183-7635

IS - 1

ER -