Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Design and methodology of the COACH-2 (Comparative study on guideline adherence and patient compliance in heart failure patients) study: HF clinics versus primary care in stable patients on optimal therapy

  • Marie Louise Luttik
  • , Maaike Brons
  • , Tiny Jaarsma
  • , Hans L. Hillege
  • , Arno W. Hoes
  • , Remco de Jong
  • , Gerard Linssen
  • , Dirk J. A. Lok
  • , M. Berger
  • , Dirk J. van Veldhuisen
  • University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Cardiology
  • Linköping University, Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Social and Welfare Studies
  • University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Epidemiology
  • University Medical Center Amsterdam, Department of Cardiology
  • Wilhelmina Ziekenhuis Assen, Department of Cardiology
  • Ziekenhuisgroep Twente, Department of Cardiology
  • Stichting Deventer Ziekenhuizen, Department of Cardiology
  • University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of General Practice and Elderly Care Medicine

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Since the number of heart failure (HF) patients is still growing and long-term treatment of HF patients is necessary, it is important to initiate effective ways for structural involvement of primary care services in HF management programs. However, evidence on whether and when patients can be referred back to be managed in primary care is lacking.

AIM: To determine whether long-term patient management in primary care, after initial optimisation of pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment in a specialised HF clinic, is equally effective as long-term management in a specialised HF clinic in terms of guideline adherence and patient compliance.

METHOD: The study is designed as a randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial. Two-hundred patients will be randomly assigned to be managed and followed in primary care or in a HFclinic. Patients are eligible to participate if they are (1) clinically stable, (2) optimally up-titrated on medication (according to ESC guidelines) and, (3) have received optimal education and counselling on pre-specified issues regarding HF and its treatment. Furthermore, close cooperation between secondary and primary care in terms of back referral to or consultation of the HF clinic will be provided.The primary outcome will be prescriber adherence and patient compliance with medication after 12 months. Secondary outcomes measures will be readmission rate, mortality, quality of life and patient compliance with other lifestyle changes.

EXPECTED RESULTS: The results of the study will add to the understanding of the role of primary care and HF clinics in the long-term follow-up of HF patients.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)307-312
JournalNetherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation
Volume20
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 24 Apr 2012

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 03 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 03 Good Health and Well-being
  2. SDG 17 - Partnerships for the Goals
    SDG 17 Partnerships for the Goals

Keywords

  • heart failure
  • primary care
  • guideline adherence
  • patient compliances
  • quality of life

Research Focus Areas Hanze University of Applied Sciences * (mandatory by Hanze)

  • Healthy Ageing

Research Focus Areas Research Centre or Centre of Expertise * (mandatory by Hanze)

  • Frailty and adequate care

Publinova themes

  • Other
  • Health

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Design and methodology of the COACH-2 (Comparative study on guideline adherence and patient compliance in heart failure patients) study: HF clinics versus primary care in stable patients on optimal therapy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this