Abstract
This article presents a case study on the implementation of the Thames Estuary 2100 Plan in the Royal Docks, a regeneration project in the East of London. On paper, the Thames Estuary 2100 Plan advances the shift from traditional flood control to flood resilience, because of its long-term horizon, estuary-wide approach, and emphasis on floodplain management. In practice, however, we identify three frictions between vision and reality: a lack of local ownership of the plan, a lack of clear guidance for floodplain management, and limited capacities with local authority. These frictions suggest an ongoing ‘public-public divide’ in decentralized governance.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 62-83 |
| Journal | Planning Practice and Research |
| Volume | 34 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2018 |
Keywords
- flood risk management
- spatial planning
- decentralization
- united kingdom
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Decentralized implementation of flood resilience measures – a blessing or a curse? lessons from the Thames Estuary 2100 Plan and the Royal Docks regeneration'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver