Covariation bias for social events and signs of (dis)approval in high and low socially anxious individuals

Peter J de Jong, Victorine de Graaf-Peters, Wiljo J P J van Hout, Rineke van Wees

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

In two covariation bias experiments, we investigated whether socially anxious women overestimate the contingency between social events and signs of rejection and/or to underestimate the contingency between social events and approval. Participants were exposed to descriptions of ambiguous or negative social events, situations involving animals, and nature scenes that were randomly paired with disgusting, happy, and neutral faces. Socially anxious participants reported enhanced belongingness between ambiguous events and signs of rejection, together with reduced belongingness between negative events and approval. This contributes to previous findings suggesting that socially anxious individuals suffer from fear-confirming interpretive biases. There was no evidence for enhanced negative or reduced positive covariation bias in socially anxious individuals.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)359-373
JournalJournal of behavior therapy and experimental psychiatry
Volume40
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2009

Keywords

  • psychology
  • social behaviour
  • anxiety

Cite this

de Jong, Peter J ; de Graaf-Peters, Victorine ; van Hout, Wiljo J P J ; van Wees, Rineke. / Covariation bias for social events and signs of (dis)approval in high and low socially anxious individuals. In: Journal of behavior therapy and experimental psychiatry. 2009 ; Vol. 40, No. 2. pp. 359-373.
@article{3d8cb01e28564ed09d7acbc6f298684d,
title = "Covariation bias for social events and signs of (dis)approval in high and low socially anxious individuals",
abstract = "In two covariation bias experiments, we investigated whether socially anxious women overestimate the contingency between social events and signs of rejection and/or to underestimate the contingency between social events and approval. Participants were exposed to descriptions of ambiguous or negative social events, situations involving animals, and nature scenes that were randomly paired with disgusting, happy, and neutral faces. Socially anxious participants reported enhanced belongingness between ambiguous events and signs of rejection, together with reduced belongingness between negative events and approval. This contributes to previous findings suggesting that socially anxious individuals suffer from fear-confirming interpretive biases. There was no evidence for enhanced negative or reduced positive covariation bias in socially anxious individuals.",
keywords = "psychology, social behaviour, anxiety, psychologie, ongerustheid",
author = "{de Jong}, {Peter J} and {de Graaf-Peters}, Victorine and {van Hout}, {Wiljo J P J} and {van Wees}, Rineke",
year = "2009",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1016/j.jbtep.2009.02.001",
language = "English",
volume = "40",
pages = "359--373",
journal = "Journal of behavior therapy and experimental psychiatry",
issn = "0005-7916",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "2",

}

Covariation bias for social events and signs of (dis)approval in high and low socially anxious individuals. / de Jong, Peter J; de Graaf-Peters, Victorine; van Hout, Wiljo J P J; van Wees, Rineke.

In: Journal of behavior therapy and experimental psychiatry, Vol. 40, No. 2, 06.2009, p. 359-373.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Covariation bias for social events and signs of (dis)approval in high and low socially anxious individuals

AU - de Jong, Peter J

AU - de Graaf-Peters, Victorine

AU - van Hout, Wiljo J P J

AU - van Wees, Rineke

PY - 2009/6

Y1 - 2009/6

N2 - In two covariation bias experiments, we investigated whether socially anxious women overestimate the contingency between social events and signs of rejection and/or to underestimate the contingency between social events and approval. Participants were exposed to descriptions of ambiguous or negative social events, situations involving animals, and nature scenes that were randomly paired with disgusting, happy, and neutral faces. Socially anxious participants reported enhanced belongingness between ambiguous events and signs of rejection, together with reduced belongingness between negative events and approval. This contributes to previous findings suggesting that socially anxious individuals suffer from fear-confirming interpretive biases. There was no evidence for enhanced negative or reduced positive covariation bias in socially anxious individuals.

AB - In two covariation bias experiments, we investigated whether socially anxious women overestimate the contingency between social events and signs of rejection and/or to underestimate the contingency between social events and approval. Participants were exposed to descriptions of ambiguous or negative social events, situations involving animals, and nature scenes that were randomly paired with disgusting, happy, and neutral faces. Socially anxious participants reported enhanced belongingness between ambiguous events and signs of rejection, together with reduced belongingness between negative events and approval. This contributes to previous findings suggesting that socially anxious individuals suffer from fear-confirming interpretive biases. There was no evidence for enhanced negative or reduced positive covariation bias in socially anxious individuals.

KW - psychology

KW - social behaviour

KW - anxiety

KW - psychologie

KW - ongerustheid

U2 - 10.1016/j.jbtep.2009.02.001

DO - 10.1016/j.jbtep.2009.02.001

M3 - Article

VL - 40

SP - 359

EP - 373

JO - Journal of behavior therapy and experimental psychiatry

JF - Journal of behavior therapy and experimental psychiatry

SN - 0005-7916

IS - 2

ER -