Considering Precision and Utility When we Talk About Pain.: Comment on Cohen et al

Graham L. Moseley; Neil Pearson; Victoria J.  Madden; Mark R.  Hutchinson; Martin  Dunbar; Anneke Beetsma; Hayley B.  Leake; Pete Moore; Laura Simons; Lauren Heathcote; Cormac Ryan; Carolyn Berryman; Amelia K. Mardon; Benedict M. Wand; Roland Reezigt

doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2022.05.010

Considering Precision and Utility When we Talk About Pain. Comment on Cohen et al

Graham L. Moseley (First author)
, Neil Pearson
, Victoria J. Madden
, Mark R. Hutchinson
, Martin Dunbar
, Anneke Beetsma
, Hayley B. Leake
, Pete Moore
, Laura Simons
, Lauren Heathcote
, Cormac Ryan
, Carolyn Berryman
, Amelia K. Mardon
, Benedict M. Wand
, Roland Reezigt

Healthy Ageing, Allied Health Care and Nursing

University of South Australia
University of British Columbia
University of Cape Town
Adelaide Medical School University of Adelaide, Kaurna Country, Adelaide Australia
Pain Concern, Edinburgh, Scotland
The Pain Toolkit
Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford Prevention Research Center
King's College London
Centre for Rehabilitation, School of Health and Life Sciences, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, UK.
Faculty of Medicine, Nursing & Midwifery and Health Sciences, The University of Notre Dame Australia, Fremantle, Western Australia, Australia
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Behavioural and Movement Sciences

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic

Abstract

We applaud many of the sentiments put forward by Cohen et al in their critique of language and logic in pain medicine. 8 Pleas to avoid conflation between nociception and pain are not new - “The mislabelling of nociceptors as pain fibres was not an elegant simplification but a most unfortunate trivialisation of pain”29 ; “.. we don't actually have ‘pain receptors’, or ‘pain nerves’ or ‘pain pathways’ or ‘pain centres.’”4 We are among those who see such conflation as contrasting with contemporary understandings of ‘how pain works’ and undermining evidence-based treatment approaches.

Translated title of the contribution	not applicable: not applicable
Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	178-181
Number of pages	4
Journal	Journal of Pain
Volume	24
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2022.05.010
Publication status	Published - 1 Jan 2023

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

SDG 03 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

pain
comment
talking

Research Focus Areas Hanze University of Applied Sciences * (mandatory by Hanze)

Healthy Ageing

Research Focus Areas Research Centre or Centre of Expertise * (mandatory by Hanze)

Frailty and adequate care

Publinova themes

Other

Access to Document

10.1016/j.jpain.2022.05.010

KNAP: Improving scientific pain knowledge and attitudes of health care professionals
Beetsma, A. (PI), Reneman, M. F. (PI), Hobbelen, H. (PI), Reezigt, R. (PI) & Paap, D. (PI)
1/09/20 → 1/09/24
Project: PHD Research

Cite this

Moseley, G. L., Pearson, N., Madden, V. J., Hutchinson, M. R., Dunbar, M., Beetsma, A., Leake, H. B., Moore, P., Simons, L., Heathcote, L., Ryan, C., Berryman, C., Mardon, A. K., Wand, B. M., & Reezigt, R. (2023). Considering Precision and Utility When we Talk About Pain. Comment on Cohen et al. Journal of Pain, 24(1), 178-181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2022.05.010

@article{52bf196149914fc0be7ae0feeece2252,

title = "Considering Precision and Utility When we Talk About Pain.: Comment on Cohen et al",

abstract = "We applaud many of the sentiments put forward by Cohen et al in their critique of language and logic in pain medicine. 8 Pleas to avoid conflation between nociception and pain are not new - “The mislabelling of nociceptors as pain fibres was not an elegant simplification but a most unfortunate trivialisation of pain”29 ; “.. we don't actually have {\textquoteleft}pain receptors{\textquoteright}, or {\textquoteleft}pain nerves{\textquoteright} or {\textquoteleft}pain pathways{\textquoteright} or {\textquoteleft}pain centres.{\textquoteright}”4 We are among those who see such conflation as contrasting with contemporary understandings of {\textquoteleft}how pain works{\textquoteright} and undermining evidence-based treatment approaches.",

keywords = "pijn, commentaar, praten, pain, comment, talking",

author = "Moseley, \{Graham L.\} and Neil Pearson and Madden, \{Victoria J.\} and Hutchinson, \{Mark R.\} and Martin Dunbar and Anneke Beetsma and Leake, \{Hayley B.\} and Pete Moore and Laura Simons and Lauren Heathcote and Cormac Ryan and Carolyn Berryman and Mardon, \{Amelia K.\} and Wand, \{Benedict M.\} and Roland Reezigt",

year = "2023",

month = jan,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1016/j.jpain.2022.05.010",

language = "English",

volume = "24",

pages = "178--181",

journal = "Journal of Pain",

issn = "1526-5900",

publisher = "Elsevier BV",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Considering Precision and Utility When we Talk About Pain.

T2 - Comment on Cohen et al

AU - Moseley, Graham L.

AU - Pearson, Neil

AU - Madden, Victoria J.

AU - Hutchinson, Mark R.

AU - Dunbar, Martin

AU - Beetsma, Anneke

AU - Leake, Hayley B.

AU - Moore, Pete

AU - Simons, Laura

AU - Heathcote, Lauren

AU - Ryan, Cormac

AU - Berryman, Carolyn

AU - Mardon, Amelia K.

AU - Wand, Benedict M.

AU - Reezigt, Roland

PY - 2023/1/1

Y1 - 2023/1/1

N2 - We applaud many of the sentiments put forward by Cohen et al in their critique of language and logic in pain medicine. 8 Pleas to avoid conflation between nociception and pain are not new - “The mislabelling of nociceptors as pain fibres was not an elegant simplification but a most unfortunate trivialisation of pain”29 ; “.. we don't actually have ‘pain receptors’, or ‘pain nerves’ or ‘pain pathways’ or ‘pain centres.’”4 We are among those who see such conflation as contrasting with contemporary understandings of ‘how pain works’ and undermining evidence-based treatment approaches.

AB - We applaud many of the sentiments put forward by Cohen et al in their critique of language and logic in pain medicine. 8 Pleas to avoid conflation between nociception and pain are not new - “The mislabelling of nociceptors as pain fibres was not an elegant simplification but a most unfortunate trivialisation of pain”29 ; “.. we don't actually have ‘pain receptors’, or ‘pain nerves’ or ‘pain pathways’ or ‘pain centres.’”4 We are among those who see such conflation as contrasting with contemporary understandings of ‘how pain works’ and undermining evidence-based treatment approaches.

KW - pijn

KW - commentaar

KW - praten

KW - pain

KW - comment

KW - talking

U2 - 10.1016/j.jpain.2022.05.010

DO - 10.1016/j.jpain.2022.05.010

M3 - Article

SN - 1526-5900

VL - 24

SP - 178

EP - 181

JO - Journal of Pain

JF - Journal of Pain

IS - 1

ER -