Coaches’ and players’ perception of training dose; not a perfect match

Michel Brink, Wouter Frencken, Geir Jordet, Koen Lemmink

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of the present study was to investigate and compare coaches' and players' perceptions of training dose for a full competitive season. METHODS: Session Rating of Perceived Exertion (session-RPE), duration and training load (session-RPE * duration) of 33 professional soccer players (height 178,2 ± 6,6 cm; weight 70,5 ± 6,4 kg; percentage of fat 12,2 ± 1,6) from an U19 and U17 squad were compared with the planned periodization of their professional coaches. Before training, coaches filled in the session Rating of Intended Exertion (session-RIE) and duration (minutes) for each player. Players rated session-RPE and training duration after each training session. RESULTS: Players perceived their intensity and training load (2446 sessions in total) significantly harder than what was intended by their coaches (P < 0.0001). The correlations between coaches' and players' intensity (r = .24), duration (r = .49) and load (r = .41) were weak (P < 0.0001). Furthermore, for coach-intended easy and intermediate training days, players reported higher intensity and training load (P < 0.0001). For hard days as intended by the coach, players reported lower intensity, duration and training load (P < 0.0001). Finally, first year players from the U17 squad perceived training sessions harder than second year players (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: The results indicate that young elite soccer players perceive training harder than what was intended by the coach. These differences could lead to maladaptation to training. Monitoring of the planned and perceived training load of coaches and players may optimize performance and prevent players from overtraining.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)497-502
JournalInternational journal of sports physiology and performance
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Keywords

  • sport
  • training

Cite this

Brink, Michel ; Frencken, Wouter ; Jordet, Geir ; Lemmink, Koen. / Coaches’ and players’ perception of training dose; not a perfect match. In: International journal of sports physiology and performance. 2013 ; pp. 497-502.
@article{3c79157494ac42b49fdec86302018f5f,
title = "Coaches’ and players’ perception of training dose; not a perfect match",
abstract = "PURPOSE: The aim of the present study was to investigate and compare coaches' and players' perceptions of training dose for a full competitive season. METHODS: Session Rating of Perceived Exertion (session-RPE), duration and training load (session-RPE * duration) of 33 professional soccer players (height 178,2 ± 6,6 cm; weight 70,5 ± 6,4 kg; percentage of fat 12,2 ± 1,6) from an U19 and U17 squad were compared with the planned periodization of their professional coaches. Before training, coaches filled in the session Rating of Intended Exertion (session-RIE) and duration (minutes) for each player. Players rated session-RPE and training duration after each training session. RESULTS: Players perceived their intensity and training load (2446 sessions in total) significantly harder than what was intended by their coaches (P < 0.0001). The correlations between coaches' and players' intensity (r = .24), duration (r = .49) and load (r = .41) were weak (P < 0.0001). Furthermore, for coach-intended easy and intermediate training days, players reported higher intensity and training load (P < 0.0001). For hard days as intended by the coach, players reported lower intensity, duration and training load (P < 0.0001). Finally, first year players from the U17 squad perceived training sessions harder than second year players (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: The results indicate that young elite soccer players perceive training harder than what was intended by the coach. These differences could lead to maladaptation to training. Monitoring of the planned and perceived training load of coaches and players may optimize performance and prevent players from overtraining.",
keywords = "sport, training",
author = "Michel Brink and Wouter Frencken and Geir Jordet and Koen Lemmink",
year = "2013",
language = "English",
pages = "497--502",
journal = "International journal of sports physiology and performance",
issn = "1555-0265",
publisher = "Human Kinetics Publishers Inc.",

}

Coaches’ and players’ perception of training dose; not a perfect match. / Brink, Michel; Frencken, Wouter; Jordet, Geir; Lemmink, Koen.

In: International journal of sports physiology and performance, 2013, p. 497-502.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Coaches’ and players’ perception of training dose; not a perfect match

AU - Brink, Michel

AU - Frencken, Wouter

AU - Jordet, Geir

AU - Lemmink, Koen

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - PURPOSE: The aim of the present study was to investigate and compare coaches' and players' perceptions of training dose for a full competitive season. METHODS: Session Rating of Perceived Exertion (session-RPE), duration and training load (session-RPE * duration) of 33 professional soccer players (height 178,2 ± 6,6 cm; weight 70,5 ± 6,4 kg; percentage of fat 12,2 ± 1,6) from an U19 and U17 squad were compared with the planned periodization of their professional coaches. Before training, coaches filled in the session Rating of Intended Exertion (session-RIE) and duration (minutes) for each player. Players rated session-RPE and training duration after each training session. RESULTS: Players perceived their intensity and training load (2446 sessions in total) significantly harder than what was intended by their coaches (P < 0.0001). The correlations between coaches' and players' intensity (r = .24), duration (r = .49) and load (r = .41) were weak (P < 0.0001). Furthermore, for coach-intended easy and intermediate training days, players reported higher intensity and training load (P < 0.0001). For hard days as intended by the coach, players reported lower intensity, duration and training load (P < 0.0001). Finally, first year players from the U17 squad perceived training sessions harder than second year players (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: The results indicate that young elite soccer players perceive training harder than what was intended by the coach. These differences could lead to maladaptation to training. Monitoring of the planned and perceived training load of coaches and players may optimize performance and prevent players from overtraining.

AB - PURPOSE: The aim of the present study was to investigate and compare coaches' and players' perceptions of training dose for a full competitive season. METHODS: Session Rating of Perceived Exertion (session-RPE), duration and training load (session-RPE * duration) of 33 professional soccer players (height 178,2 ± 6,6 cm; weight 70,5 ± 6,4 kg; percentage of fat 12,2 ± 1,6) from an U19 and U17 squad were compared with the planned periodization of their professional coaches. Before training, coaches filled in the session Rating of Intended Exertion (session-RIE) and duration (minutes) for each player. Players rated session-RPE and training duration after each training session. RESULTS: Players perceived their intensity and training load (2446 sessions in total) significantly harder than what was intended by their coaches (P < 0.0001). The correlations between coaches' and players' intensity (r = .24), duration (r = .49) and load (r = .41) were weak (P < 0.0001). Furthermore, for coach-intended easy and intermediate training days, players reported higher intensity and training load (P < 0.0001). For hard days as intended by the coach, players reported lower intensity, duration and training load (P < 0.0001). Finally, first year players from the U17 squad perceived training sessions harder than second year players (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: The results indicate that young elite soccer players perceive training harder than what was intended by the coach. These differences could lead to maladaptation to training. Monitoring of the planned and perceived training load of coaches and players may optimize performance and prevent players from overtraining.

KW - sport

KW - training

M3 - Article

SP - 497

EP - 502

JO - International journal of sports physiology and performance

JF - International journal of sports physiology and performance

SN - 1555-0265

ER -