Characteristics of auditory processing disorders: a systematic review

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this review article is to describe characteristics of auditory processing disorders (APD) by evaluating the literature in which children with suspected or diagnosed APD were compared with typically developing children and to determine whether APD must be regarded as a deficit specific to the auditory modality or as a multimodal deficit.

METHOD: Six electronic databases were searched for peer-reviewed studies investigating children with (suspected) APD in comparison with typically developing peers. Relevant studies were independently reviewed and appraised by 2 reviewers. Methodological quality was quantified using the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association's levels of evidence.

RESULTS: Fifty-three relevant studies were identified. Five studies were excluded because of weak internal validity. In total, 48 studies were included, of which only 1 was classified as having strong methodological quality. Significant dissimilarities were found between children referred with listening difficulties and controls. These differences relate to auditory and visual functioning, cognition, language, reading, and physiological and neuroimaging measures.

CONCLUSIONS: Methodological quality of most of the incorporated studies was rated moderate due to the heterogeneous groups of participants, inadequate descriptions of participants, and the omission of valid and reliable measurements. The listening difficulties of children with APD may be a consequence of cognitive, language, and attention issues rather than bottom-up auditory processing.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)384-413
JournalJournal of speech, language, and hearing research
Volume59
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2016

Keywords

  • auditory processing disorders
  • children

Cite this

@article{e5d2375bafdc467bbb8a62cdbb159642,
title = "Characteristics of auditory processing disorders: a systematic review",
abstract = "PURPOSE: The purpose of this review article is to describe characteristics of auditory processing disorders (APD) by evaluating the literature in which children with suspected or diagnosed APD were compared with typically developing children and to determine whether APD must be regarded as a deficit specific to the auditory modality or as a multimodal deficit.METHOD: Six electronic databases were searched for peer-reviewed studies investigating children with (suspected) APD in comparison with typically developing peers. Relevant studies were independently reviewed and appraised by 2 reviewers. Methodological quality was quantified using the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association's levels of evidence.RESULTS: Fifty-three relevant studies were identified. Five studies were excluded because of weak internal validity. In total, 48 studies were included, of which only 1 was classified as having strong methodological quality. Significant dissimilarities were found between children referred with listening difficulties and controls. These differences relate to auditory and visual functioning, cognition, language, reading, and physiological and neuroimaging measures.CONCLUSIONS: Methodological quality of most of the incorporated studies was rated moderate due to the heterogeneous groups of participants, inadequate descriptions of participants, and the omission of valid and reliable measurements. The listening difficulties of children with APD may be a consequence of cognitive, language, and attention issues rather than bottom-up auditory processing.",
keywords = "auditory processing disorders, children, hoorproblemen, kinderen",
author = "{de Wit}, Ellen and Visser-Bochane, {Margot I} and Bert Steenbergen and {van Dijk}, Pim and {van der Schans}, {Cees P} and Luinge, {Margreet R}",
year = "2016",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1044/2015_JSLHR-H-15-0118",
language = "English",
volume = "59",
pages = "384--413",
journal = "Journal of speech, language, and hearing research",
issn = "1092-4388",
publisher = "American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA)",
number = "2",

}

Characteristics of auditory processing disorders : a systematic review. / de Wit, Ellen; Visser-Bochane, Margot I; Steenbergen, Bert; van Dijk, Pim; van der Schans, Cees P; Luinge, Margreet R.

In: Journal of speech, language, and hearing research, Vol. 59, No. 2, 01.04.2016, p. 384-413.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Characteristics of auditory processing disorders

T2 - a systematic review

AU - de Wit, Ellen

AU - Visser-Bochane, Margot I

AU - Steenbergen, Bert

AU - van Dijk, Pim

AU - van der Schans, Cees P

AU - Luinge, Margreet R

PY - 2016/4/1

Y1 - 2016/4/1

N2 - PURPOSE: The purpose of this review article is to describe characteristics of auditory processing disorders (APD) by evaluating the literature in which children with suspected or diagnosed APD were compared with typically developing children and to determine whether APD must be regarded as a deficit specific to the auditory modality or as a multimodal deficit.METHOD: Six electronic databases were searched for peer-reviewed studies investigating children with (suspected) APD in comparison with typically developing peers. Relevant studies were independently reviewed and appraised by 2 reviewers. Methodological quality was quantified using the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association's levels of evidence.RESULTS: Fifty-three relevant studies were identified. Five studies were excluded because of weak internal validity. In total, 48 studies were included, of which only 1 was classified as having strong methodological quality. Significant dissimilarities were found between children referred with listening difficulties and controls. These differences relate to auditory and visual functioning, cognition, language, reading, and physiological and neuroimaging measures.CONCLUSIONS: Methodological quality of most of the incorporated studies was rated moderate due to the heterogeneous groups of participants, inadequate descriptions of participants, and the omission of valid and reliable measurements. The listening difficulties of children with APD may be a consequence of cognitive, language, and attention issues rather than bottom-up auditory processing.

AB - PURPOSE: The purpose of this review article is to describe characteristics of auditory processing disorders (APD) by evaluating the literature in which children with suspected or diagnosed APD were compared with typically developing children and to determine whether APD must be regarded as a deficit specific to the auditory modality or as a multimodal deficit.METHOD: Six electronic databases were searched for peer-reviewed studies investigating children with (suspected) APD in comparison with typically developing peers. Relevant studies were independently reviewed and appraised by 2 reviewers. Methodological quality was quantified using the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association's levels of evidence.RESULTS: Fifty-three relevant studies were identified. Five studies were excluded because of weak internal validity. In total, 48 studies were included, of which only 1 was classified as having strong methodological quality. Significant dissimilarities were found between children referred with listening difficulties and controls. These differences relate to auditory and visual functioning, cognition, language, reading, and physiological and neuroimaging measures.CONCLUSIONS: Methodological quality of most of the incorporated studies was rated moderate due to the heterogeneous groups of participants, inadequate descriptions of participants, and the omission of valid and reliable measurements. The listening difficulties of children with APD may be a consequence of cognitive, language, and attention issues rather than bottom-up auditory processing.

KW - auditory processing disorders

KW - children

KW - hoorproblemen

KW - kinderen

UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/characteristics-auditory-processing-disorders-systematic-review

U2 - 10.1044/2015_JSLHR-H-15-0118

DO - 10.1044/2015_JSLHR-H-15-0118

M3 - Review article

VL - 59

SP - 384

EP - 413

JO - Journal of speech, language, and hearing research

JF - Journal of speech, language, and hearing research

SN - 1092-4388

IS - 2

ER -