Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Bridging the gap in nutrition assessment: Barriers and knowledge impact of an educational session on body composition and energy metabolism

  • Camilia E Orsso (First author)
  • , Anne Caretero
  • , Homa Ghomashchi
  • , Marlis Atkins
  • , Thiago Barbosa-Silva
  • , Carlota Basualdo-Hammond
  • , Diana Cardenaz Braz
  • , Stephane Chevalier
  • , Maria Cristina Gonzalez
  • , Leah Gramlich
  • , Harriët Jager-Wittenaar
  • , Nicole Kiss
  • , Sarah Purcell
  • , Maira Quintanilha
  • , Satnam Sidhu
  • , Puneeta Tandon
  • , Mei Tom
  • , Carla Prado
  • Department of Agricultural, Food, and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton
  • Alberta Health Services
  • Federal University of Pelotas
  • Gustave Roussy, Nutrition Unit
  • McGill University
  • Louisiana State University, Pennington Biomedical Research Center
  • University of Alberta
  • Radboud University Medical Centre, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Dietetics
  • Faculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy, Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Research Unit Experimental Anatomy, Vrije Universiteit
  • Deakin University
  • University of British Columbia
  • BC Cancer – Victoria

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Background: Body composition and energy metabolism assessments are central to nutrition care but remain underused. This study evaluated dietitians’ access, use, education, and beliefs toward these assessments, and the impact of an educational session. Methods: Dietitians (≥1 year experience) within Alberta Health Services completed online surveys on their access, use, education, confidence, and clinical protocol awareness regarding body composition and energy metabolism assessments. Participants attended a 4-h virtual educational session on these topics, with presession and postsession knowledge recall compared using Wilcoxon signed rank test. Results: We surveyed 36 participants (97% women), primarily from inpatient care (36%) or oncology (31%). Most (86%) never used body composition methods, despite access to computerized tomography (CT; 31%), ultrasound (US; 25%), bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA; 6%), and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA; 3%). Although 67% received body composition education (47% BIA, 31% DXA, 22% CT, 8% US), 64% lacked confidence. Protocol awareness was 67% for malnutrition and 8% for sarcopenia. Most never (58%) or occasionally (19%) used energy metabolism methods; Q-NRG (COSMED; 28%) and standard metabolic carts (19%) were the most available devices. Although 67% received energy metabolism education (53% metabolic cart, 31% Q-NRG), 50% were not confident in using these methods. After the educational session, body composition knowledge recall improved (median, +20% [IQR, 10–30]; P < 0.001), whereas energy metabolism scores were unchanged (P = 0.530). Conclusion: Despite prior education, dietitians used body composition and energy metabolism assessments inconsistently because of limited access, insufficient applied knowledge, lack of protocols, and low confidence. These results underscore the need to strengthen curriculum and professional development to support adoption.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)859-870
Number of pages12
JournalNutrition in Clinical Practice
Volume41
Issue number3
Early online date2 Feb 2026
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2026

Keywords

  • body composition
  • diet
  • energy metabolism
  • healthcare
  • implementation
  • methods
  • nutrition
  • assessment
  • nutrition care process
  • nutritionists
  • practice change

Research Focus Areas Hanze University of Applied Sciences * (mandatory by Hanze)

  • Healthy Ageing

Research Focus Areas Research Centre or Centre of Expertise * (mandatory by Hanze)

  • Frailty and adequate care

Publinova themes

  • Other
  • Health

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Bridging the gap in nutrition assessment: Barriers and knowledge impact of an educational session on body composition and energy metabolism'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this