Attributing design decisions in the evaluation of game-based health interventions

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingContribution to conference proceedingAcademicpeer-review

45 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The use of games as interventions in the domain of health care is of-ten paired with evaluating the effects in randomized clinical trials. The iterative design and development process of games usually also involves an evaluation phase, aimed at identifying improvements for subsequent iterations. Since game design theory and theories from associated fields provide no unified framework for designing successful interventions, interpreting evaluation results and for-mulating improvements is complicated. This case study explores an approach of monitoring design decisions and corresponding theories throughout the design and development cycle, allowing evaluation results to be attributed to design decisions. Such an approach may allow the game design and development pro-cess to iterate the game more efficiently towards use in practice.

3rd European Conference on Gaming and Playful Interaction in Health Care.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationGames for Health
Subtitle of host publicationProceedings of the 3rd european conference on gaming and playful interaction in health care
EditorsBen Schouten, Stephen Fedtke, Tilde Bekker, Marlies Schijven, Alex Gekker
Place of PublicationWiesbaden
PublisherSpringer Vieweg
Pages61-74
ISBN (Electronic)978-3-658-02897-8
ISBN (Print)978-3-658-02896-1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013
Event3rd Games for Health Europe Conference 2013 - KPMG Building, Amsterdam, Netherlands
Duration: 28 Oct 201329 Oct 2013
Conference number: 3rd
http://www.gamesforhealtheurope.org/#

Conference

Conference3rd Games for Health Europe Conference 2013
Abbreviated titleGFHEU 2013
CountryNetherlands
CityAmsterdam
Period28/10/1329/10/13
Internet address

Keywords

  • game development
  • game design
  • evaluation
  • validation
  • health intervention

Cite this

Braad, E., Folkerts, J., & Jonker, N. (2013). Attributing design decisions in the evaluation of game-based health interventions. In B. Schouten, S. Fedtke, T. Bekker, M. Schijven, & A. Gekker (Eds.), Games for Health: Proceedings of the 3rd european conference on gaming and playful interaction in health care (pp. 61-74). Wiesbaden: Springer Vieweg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-02897-8
Braad, Eelco ; Folkerts, Jef ; Jonker, Niek. / Attributing design decisions in the evaluation of game-based health interventions. Games for Health: Proceedings of the 3rd european conference on gaming and playful interaction in health care. editor / Ben Schouten ; Stephen Fedtke ; Tilde Bekker ; Marlies Schijven ; Alex Gekker. Wiesbaden : Springer Vieweg, 2013. pp. 61-74
@inproceedings{40b6b3c44f0c4df6a2f6cba2f932c580,
title = "Attributing design decisions in the evaluation of game-based health interventions",
abstract = "The use of games as interventions in the domain of health care is of-ten paired with evaluating the effects in randomized clinical trials. The iterative design and development process of games usually also involves an evaluation phase, aimed at identifying improvements for subsequent iterations. Since game design theory and theories from associated fields provide no unified framework for designing successful interventions, interpreting evaluation results and for-mulating improvements is complicated. This case study explores an approach of monitoring design decisions and corresponding theories throughout the design and development cycle, allowing evaluation results to be attributed to design decisions. Such an approach may allow the game design and development pro-cess to iterate the game more efficiently towards use in practice.3rd European Conference on Gaming and Playful Interaction in Health Care.",
keywords = "spelontwikkeling, spelontwerp, evaluatie, ratificatie, gezondheidsinterventie, game development, game design, evaluation, validation, health intervention",
author = "Eelco Braad and Jef Folkerts and Niek Jonker",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1007/978-3-658-02897-8",
language = "English",
isbn = "978-3-658-02896-1",
pages = "61--74",
editor = "Ben Schouten and Stephen Fedtke and Tilde Bekker and Marlies Schijven and Alex Gekker",
booktitle = "Games for Health",
publisher = "Springer Vieweg",

}

Braad, E, Folkerts, J & Jonker, N 2013, Attributing design decisions in the evaluation of game-based health interventions. in B Schouten, S Fedtke, T Bekker, M Schijven & A Gekker (eds), Games for Health: Proceedings of the 3rd european conference on gaming and playful interaction in health care. Springer Vieweg, Wiesbaden, pp. 61-74, 3rd Games for Health Europe Conference 2013, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 28/10/13. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-02897-8

Attributing design decisions in the evaluation of game-based health interventions. / Braad, Eelco; Folkerts, Jef; Jonker, Niek.

Games for Health: Proceedings of the 3rd european conference on gaming and playful interaction in health care. ed. / Ben Schouten; Stephen Fedtke; Tilde Bekker; Marlies Schijven; Alex Gekker. Wiesbaden : Springer Vieweg, 2013. p. 61-74.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingContribution to conference proceedingAcademicpeer-review

TY - GEN

T1 - Attributing design decisions in the evaluation of game-based health interventions

AU - Braad, Eelco

AU - Folkerts, Jef

AU - Jonker, Niek

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - The use of games as interventions in the domain of health care is of-ten paired with evaluating the effects in randomized clinical trials. The iterative design and development process of games usually also involves an evaluation phase, aimed at identifying improvements for subsequent iterations. Since game design theory and theories from associated fields provide no unified framework for designing successful interventions, interpreting evaluation results and for-mulating improvements is complicated. This case study explores an approach of monitoring design decisions and corresponding theories throughout the design and development cycle, allowing evaluation results to be attributed to design decisions. Such an approach may allow the game design and development pro-cess to iterate the game more efficiently towards use in practice.3rd European Conference on Gaming and Playful Interaction in Health Care.

AB - The use of games as interventions in the domain of health care is of-ten paired with evaluating the effects in randomized clinical trials. The iterative design and development process of games usually also involves an evaluation phase, aimed at identifying improvements for subsequent iterations. Since game design theory and theories from associated fields provide no unified framework for designing successful interventions, interpreting evaluation results and for-mulating improvements is complicated. This case study explores an approach of monitoring design decisions and corresponding theories throughout the design and development cycle, allowing evaluation results to be attributed to design decisions. Such an approach may allow the game design and development pro-cess to iterate the game more efficiently towards use in practice.3rd European Conference on Gaming and Playful Interaction in Health Care.

KW - spelontwikkeling

KW - spelontwerp

KW - evaluatie

KW - ratificatie

KW - gezondheidsinterventie

KW - game development

KW - game design

KW - evaluation

KW - validation

KW - health intervention

U2 - 10.1007/978-3-658-02897-8

DO - 10.1007/978-3-658-02897-8

M3 - Contribution to conference proceeding

SN - 978-3-658-02896-1

SP - 61

EP - 74

BT - Games for Health

A2 - Schouten, Ben

A2 - Fedtke, Stephen

A2 - Bekker, Tilde

A2 - Schijven, Marlies

A2 - Gekker, Alex

PB - Springer Vieweg

CY - Wiesbaden

ER -

Braad E, Folkerts J, Jonker N. Attributing design decisions in the evaluation of game-based health interventions. In Schouten B, Fedtke S, Bekker T, Schijven M, Gekker A, editors, Games for Health: Proceedings of the 3rd european conference on gaming and playful interaction in health care. Wiesbaden: Springer Vieweg. 2013. p. 61-74 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-02897-8