TY - CHAP
T1 - Artful Empiricism and Improvising with the Unforeseen
T2 - Two approaches in seeking understandings of nature through art
AU - van Boeckel, Jan
N1 - 1. The development of this four-stage process is attributed to Johannes Bockemühl, former director of
the Natural Science Section of the Goetheanum in Dornach, Switzerland, the international centre of
the Anthroposophical Society (Davis, 2006).
2. The names of the four stages in the Goethean process as they are described in the following are
derived from Irwin (2012), “Audit of Goethean Process: As Outlined by Leading Experts in the
Field.”
3. I learned to do this – myself being a participant – from sculptor Antony Gormley in 2006. Gormley
had come to Schumacher College in Dartington, England, to co-teach a course on art and ecology.
4. James Elkins pointed at something similar when he observed that “emptying of the brain through
painting creates a vacuum that attracts real spontaneous knowledge” (Elkins, cited in Lipsett, 2009,
p. 44).
5. Bateson found that organisms tend to respond differently to the same signal if it is presented to them
in a different context. He thought that this may be due to recognition of the particular context they
have entered. Consequently, he held that the experiment always puts a label on the context in which
one is (Brand, 1973).
PY - 2017
Y1 - 2017
N2 - Arts-based environmental education (AEE) denotes an emerging field of pedagogy wherein facilitated art practice intersects with and informs learning about our natural and cultural environments. In it, artmaking is appreciated as a form of coming to knowledge, of making meaning, in its own right, on par with other approaches such as inquiry-based learning in the science classroom. In this article, the author, himself a practitioner, foregrounds two different orientations in learning about nature through art that he considers both as being expressive of AEE. The first one, here called “artful empiricism”, is more established and has its footings in “the Goethean approach”. Participants investigate natural phenomena through direct observation and experience of the world. This is then complemented by intuitive perception. Yet, for the most part, they are absorbed in what Dewey would call a receptive sense of “undergoing”. Aesthetic sensibility is foregrounded, encouraging participants to fine-tune their senses in order to perceive the phenomenon in nature with “fresh eyes”. The second orientation is hardly articulated as an epistemology yet. Here it is called “improvising with emerging properties” and it features an element of working with unforeseen properties that emerge in and through an artmaking process that thematises natural phenomena. It is intrinsically open-ended and an active “acting upon” the world takes centre stage. Through artmaking, participants explore the relationships between themselves and their environs. In his discussion, the author analyses these approaches as two modalities both expressive of a Deweyan cycle of alternating between a receptive undergoing of and active acting upon the world, in different phases of a reflective experience.
AB - Arts-based environmental education (AEE) denotes an emerging field of pedagogy wherein facilitated art practice intersects with and informs learning about our natural and cultural environments. In it, artmaking is appreciated as a form of coming to knowledge, of making meaning, in its own right, on par with other approaches such as inquiry-based learning in the science classroom. In this article, the author, himself a practitioner, foregrounds two different orientations in learning about nature through art that he considers both as being expressive of AEE. The first one, here called “artful empiricism”, is more established and has its footings in “the Goethean approach”. Participants investigate natural phenomena through direct observation and experience of the world. This is then complemented by intuitive perception. Yet, for the most part, they are absorbed in what Dewey would call a receptive sense of “undergoing”. Aesthetic sensibility is foregrounded, encouraging participants to fine-tune their senses in order to perceive the phenomenon in nature with “fresh eyes”. The second orientation is hardly articulated as an epistemology yet. Here it is called “improvising with emerging properties” and it features an element of working with unforeseen properties that emerge in and through an artmaking process that thematises natural phenomena. It is intrinsically open-ended and an active “acting upon” the world takes centre stage. Through artmaking, participants explore the relationships between themselves and their environs. In his discussion, the author analyses these approaches as two modalities both expressive of a Deweyan cycle of alternating between a receptive undergoing of and active acting upon the world, in different phases of a reflective experience.
KW - kunst
KW - natuur
KW - duurzaamheid
KW - art
KW - nature
KW - sustainability
M3 - Chapter
SN - ISBN 978-951-39-7267-7
VL - 161
SP - 145
EP - 161
BT - CULTURE IN SUSTAINABILITY
A2 - ASIKAINEN, SARI
A2 - BRITES, CLAUDIA
A2 - PLEBAŃCZYK, KATARZYNA
A2 - ROGAČ MIJATOVIĆ, LJILJANA
A2 - SOINI, KATRIINA
PB - SoPhi, University of Jyväskylä, Department of Social Sciences and Philosophy
CY - Finland
ER -