A time- and space-resolved catalyst deactivation study on the conversion of glycerol to aromatics using H-ZSM-5

Songbo He, Hero Reinder Goldhoorn, Zhuorigebatu Tegudeer, Anshu Chandel, André Heeres, Marc C.A. Stuart, Hero Jan Heeres

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    Abstract

    A time- and space-resolved deactivation study on the conversion of glycerol to aromatics over H-ZSM-5 was performed. For this purpose, glycerol was vaporized/pyrolyzed in a pyrolysis section followed by a catalytic aromatization step. Benchmark performance showed an induction period of ca. 20 min, followed by a rather constant BTX yield of ca. 25.4 ± 2.2C.% for 3–4 h time on stream (TOS). Subsequently, a rapid drop in BTX yield was observed due to catalyst deactivation. Severe coking leads to coverage of catalyst surface area and blockage of micropores, particularly at the entrance of the catalyst bed at short TOS, indicating the presence of an axial coke gradient in the fixed bed reactor. At longer TOS, coke was formed throughout the bed and negligible BTX yield was shown to be associated with the presence of coke at all bed positions. Besides coking, the acidity of the catalyst was also reduced, and dealumination occurred, both with a similar time–space evolution. The results were explained by a conversion-zone migration model, which includes a deactivation zone (with severely coked catalyst), a conversion zone (BTX formation), and an induction zone (a.o. (de-)alkylation reactions), and describes the time- and space-resolved evolution of coking and relevant changes in other catalyst characteristics.
    Original languageEnglish
    Article number134620
    JournalChemical Engineering Journal
    Volume434
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 15 Apr 2022

    Keywords

    • glycerol
    • pyrolysis

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'A time- and space-resolved catalyst deactivation study on the conversion of glycerol to aromatics using H-ZSM-5'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this