A strategy-based framework for assessing the flood resilience of cities: a Hamburg case study

Britta Restemeyer (First author), Johan Woltjer, Margo van den Brink

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

© 2015, © 2015 Taylor & Francis. Climate change and continuous urbanization contribute to an increased urban vulnerability towards flooding. Only relying on traditional flood control measures is recognized as inadequate, since the damage can be catastrophic if flood controls fail. The idea of a flood-resilient city – one which can withstand or adapt to a flood event without being harmed in its functionality – seems promising. But what does resilience actually mean when it is applied to urban environments exposed to flood risk, and how can resilience be achieved? This paper presents a heuristic framework for assessing the flood resilience of cities, for scientists and policy-makers alike. It enriches the current literature on flood resilience by clarifying the meaning of its three key characteristics – robustness, adaptability and transformability – and identifying important components to implement resilience strategies. The resilience discussion moves a step forward, from predominantly defining resilience to generating insight into “doing” resilience in practice. The framework is illustrated with two case studies from Hamburg, showing that resilience, and particularly the underlying notions of adaptability and transformability, first and foremost require further capacity-building among public as well as private stakeholders. The case studies suggest that flood resilience is currently not enough motivation to move from traditional to more resilient flood protection schemes in practice; rather, it needs to be integrated into a bigger urban agenda.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)45-62
JournalPlanning theory and practice
Volume16
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 23 Feb 2015

Keywords

  • resilient cities
  • flood risk management
  • urban planning
  • resilience strategies

Cite this

@article{37f6a80b095d46ffabd7c25f059fc38a,
title = "A strategy-based framework for assessing the flood resilience of cities: a Hamburg case study",
abstract = "{\circledC} 2015, {\circledC} 2015 Taylor & Francis. Climate change and continuous urbanization contribute to an increased urban vulnerability towards flooding. Only relying on traditional flood control measures is recognized as inadequate, since the damage can be catastrophic if flood controls fail. The idea of a flood-resilient city – one which can withstand or adapt to a flood event without being harmed in its functionality – seems promising. But what does resilience actually mean when it is applied to urban environments exposed to flood risk, and how can resilience be achieved? This paper presents a heuristic framework for assessing the flood resilience of cities, for scientists and policy-makers alike. It enriches the current literature on flood resilience by clarifying the meaning of its three key characteristics – robustness, adaptability and transformability – and identifying important components to implement resilience strategies. The resilience discussion moves a step forward, from predominantly defining resilience to generating insight into “doing” resilience in practice. The framework is illustrated with two case studies from Hamburg, showing that resilience, and particularly the underlying notions of adaptability and transformability, first and foremost require further capacity-building among public as well as private stakeholders. The case studies suggest that flood resilience is currently not enough motivation to move from traditional to more resilient flood protection schemes in practice; rather, it needs to be integrated into a bigger urban agenda.",
keywords = "resilient cities, flood risk management, urban planning, resilience strategies, watermanagement",
author = "Britta Restemeyer and Johan Woltjer and {van den Brink}, Margo",
year = "2015",
month = "2",
day = "23",
doi = "10.1080/14649357.2014.1000950",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
pages = "45--62",
journal = "Planning theory and practice",
issn = "1464-9357",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "1",

}

A strategy-based framework for assessing the flood resilience of cities : a Hamburg case study. / Restemeyer, Britta (First author); Woltjer, Johan; van den Brink, Margo.

In: Planning theory and practice, Vol. 16, No. 1, 23.02.2015, p. 45-62.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - A strategy-based framework for assessing the flood resilience of cities

T2 - a Hamburg case study

AU - Restemeyer, Britta

AU - Woltjer, Johan

AU - van den Brink, Margo

PY - 2015/2/23

Y1 - 2015/2/23

N2 - © 2015, © 2015 Taylor & Francis. Climate change and continuous urbanization contribute to an increased urban vulnerability towards flooding. Only relying on traditional flood control measures is recognized as inadequate, since the damage can be catastrophic if flood controls fail. The idea of a flood-resilient city – one which can withstand or adapt to a flood event without being harmed in its functionality – seems promising. But what does resilience actually mean when it is applied to urban environments exposed to flood risk, and how can resilience be achieved? This paper presents a heuristic framework for assessing the flood resilience of cities, for scientists and policy-makers alike. It enriches the current literature on flood resilience by clarifying the meaning of its three key characteristics – robustness, adaptability and transformability – and identifying important components to implement resilience strategies. The resilience discussion moves a step forward, from predominantly defining resilience to generating insight into “doing” resilience in practice. The framework is illustrated with two case studies from Hamburg, showing that resilience, and particularly the underlying notions of adaptability and transformability, first and foremost require further capacity-building among public as well as private stakeholders. The case studies suggest that flood resilience is currently not enough motivation to move from traditional to more resilient flood protection schemes in practice; rather, it needs to be integrated into a bigger urban agenda.

AB - © 2015, © 2015 Taylor & Francis. Climate change and continuous urbanization contribute to an increased urban vulnerability towards flooding. Only relying on traditional flood control measures is recognized as inadequate, since the damage can be catastrophic if flood controls fail. The idea of a flood-resilient city – one which can withstand or adapt to a flood event without being harmed in its functionality – seems promising. But what does resilience actually mean when it is applied to urban environments exposed to flood risk, and how can resilience be achieved? This paper presents a heuristic framework for assessing the flood resilience of cities, for scientists and policy-makers alike. It enriches the current literature on flood resilience by clarifying the meaning of its three key characteristics – robustness, adaptability and transformability – and identifying important components to implement resilience strategies. The resilience discussion moves a step forward, from predominantly defining resilience to generating insight into “doing” resilience in practice. The framework is illustrated with two case studies from Hamburg, showing that resilience, and particularly the underlying notions of adaptability and transformability, first and foremost require further capacity-building among public as well as private stakeholders. The case studies suggest that flood resilience is currently not enough motivation to move from traditional to more resilient flood protection schemes in practice; rather, it needs to be integrated into a bigger urban agenda.

KW - resilient cities

KW - flood risk management

KW - urban planning

KW - resilience strategies

KW - watermanagement

UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/strategybased-framework-assessing-flood-resilience-cities-hamburg-case-study

U2 - 10.1080/14649357.2014.1000950

DO - 10.1080/14649357.2014.1000950

M3 - Article

VL - 16

SP - 45

EP - 62

JO - Planning theory and practice

JF - Planning theory and practice

SN - 1464-9357

IS - 1

ER -