A process approach to children's understanding of scientific concepts: a longitudinal case study

Henderien Steenbeek, Steffie van der Steen, Marijn van Dijk, Paul van Geert

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Using a longitudinal study on childrens’ understanding of scientific concepts, we compare the relative importance of general (e.g., standardized test scores) and microgenetic measures (interaction patterns) to characterize the development of scientific understanding over 1.5 years. A researcher worked five times with 31 children (3-5 years old, from regular and special primary schools) on scientific tasks about air pressure and gravity. The researchers scaffolding behavior and the childs understanding were coded per utterance. Furthermore, children’s standardized test scores (math and language) and information on their home environment were obtained. A cluster analysis yielded three distinct developmental trajectories, which could best be predicted by interactions between the child and the environment. In the discussion we question the validity of standardized tests
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)84-91
JournalLearning and individual differences
Volume30
Issue numberFebruary
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Keywords

  • children
  • science
  • complexity approach
  • microdevelopment

Cite this

Steenbeek, Henderien ; van der Steen, Steffie ; van Dijk, Marijn ; van Geert, Paul. / A process approach to children's understanding of scientific concepts : a longitudinal case study. In: Learning and individual differences. 2014 ; Vol. 30, No. February. pp. 84-91.
@article{71e1a584b6be4810aa34c58c2c962857,
title = "A process approach to children's understanding of scientific concepts: a longitudinal case study",
abstract = "Using a longitudinal study on childrens’ understanding of scientific concepts, we compare the relative importance of general (e.g., standardized test scores) and microgenetic measures (interaction patterns) to characterize the development of scientific understanding over 1.5 years. A researcher worked five times with 31 children (3-5 years old, from regular and special primary schools) on scientific tasks about air pressure and gravity. The researchers scaffolding behavior and the childs understanding were coded per utterance. Furthermore, children’s standardized test scores (math and language) and information on their home environment were obtained. A cluster analysis yielded three distinct developmental trajectories, which could best be predicted by interactions between the child and the environment. In the discussion we question the validity of standardized tests",
keywords = "kinderen, cognitieve ontwikkeling, begrip, wetenschap, complexe aanpak, micro-ontwikkeling, children, science, complexity approach, microdevelopment",
author = "Henderien Steenbeek and {van der Steen}, Steffie and {van Dijk}, Marijn and {van Geert}, Paul",
note = "References.",
year = "2014",
language = "English",
volume = "30",
pages = "84--91",
journal = "Learning and individual differences",
issn = "1873-3425",
publisher = "Elsevier Science",
number = "February",

}

A process approach to children's understanding of scientific concepts : a longitudinal case study. / Steenbeek, Henderien; van der Steen, Steffie; van Dijk, Marijn; van Geert, Paul.

In: Learning and individual differences, Vol. 30, No. February, 2014, p. 84-91.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - A process approach to children's understanding of scientific concepts

T2 - a longitudinal case study

AU - Steenbeek, Henderien

AU - van der Steen, Steffie

AU - van Dijk, Marijn

AU - van Geert, Paul

N1 - References.

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Using a longitudinal study on childrens’ understanding of scientific concepts, we compare the relative importance of general (e.g., standardized test scores) and microgenetic measures (interaction patterns) to characterize the development of scientific understanding over 1.5 years. A researcher worked five times with 31 children (3-5 years old, from regular and special primary schools) on scientific tasks about air pressure and gravity. The researchers scaffolding behavior and the childs understanding were coded per utterance. Furthermore, children’s standardized test scores (math and language) and information on their home environment were obtained. A cluster analysis yielded three distinct developmental trajectories, which could best be predicted by interactions between the child and the environment. In the discussion we question the validity of standardized tests

AB - Using a longitudinal study on childrens’ understanding of scientific concepts, we compare the relative importance of general (e.g., standardized test scores) and microgenetic measures (interaction patterns) to characterize the development of scientific understanding over 1.5 years. A researcher worked five times with 31 children (3-5 years old, from regular and special primary schools) on scientific tasks about air pressure and gravity. The researchers scaffolding behavior and the childs understanding were coded per utterance. Furthermore, children’s standardized test scores (math and language) and information on their home environment were obtained. A cluster analysis yielded three distinct developmental trajectories, which could best be predicted by interactions between the child and the environment. In the discussion we question the validity of standardized tests

KW - kinderen

KW - cognitieve ontwikkeling

KW - begrip

KW - wetenschap

KW - complexe aanpak

KW - micro-ontwikkeling

KW - children

KW - science

KW - complexity approach

KW - microdevelopment

M3 - Article

VL - 30

SP - 84

EP - 91

JO - Learning and individual differences

JF - Learning and individual differences

SN - 1873-3425

IS - February

ER -